Making female law firm leaders 'normal' - Reed Smith's Tamara Box on the impact of role models
Reed Smith Europe and Middle East managing partner Tamara Box on the importance of senior female role models
March 08, 2017 at 06:40 AM
4 minute read
To coincide with International Women's Day, Legal Week has asked a number of high profile female law firm leaders and partners for their advice for other women hoping for the same success. In this interview, Reed Smith Europe and Middle East managing partner Tamara Box discusses the importance of mentors, sponsors and senior female role models
Mentors offer advice that helps to shape the actions and attitudes of women as they develop their careers. Sponsors champion those women to partners, management and clients, to ensure that others know about their skills and qualities. Both mentoring and sponsoring are conscious, overt actions that have been shown to be successful in moving women (and men) through the pipeline toward leadership.
Yet many key management positions still remain elusive, even for the most qualified women with the most conscientious sponsors, because the conscious brain cannot overcome the implicit bias that influences decision-making.
"I have no bias," you hear leaders protest, "I consider men and women equally." But we all know that isn't true. Everyone is biased in one way or another as a result of the development in our subconscious of a sense of what is 'normal' or 'the norm'.
That's where role models come in.
Many people think the function of a role model is to be an example, sending a message to aspiring leaders that "I have made it; so can you". Certainly, a good role model will inspire ambitious women but role models also operate on a sociological level to change the subconscious mindset; in this way, they target the population as a whole – men and women alike. The actual work of the person who fills the role model shoes is less important than the subtle signal that she sends that it is 'normal' to have female leaders.
Implicit bias is not limited to men; women have also been shown to have implicit bias against women. Neither training nor managerial directive has been able to mitigate the culturally defined 'norm' that keeps women from reaching their potential and law firms from benefiting from the fresh thinking that diversity provides.
There is an answer to the problem, however – role models. When the leader of a large law firm or corporation is just as likely to be female as male, implicit bias is no longer a factor in the selection of partners, managers and leaders. The subconscious mind accepts both genders as 'normal'.
A gradual trend toward gender balance is occurring, thanks to the work of mentors, sponsors and leaders who are trying to shift the needle with executive actions. But sociological change, not individual change, is needed if we are to transform our businesses in the near future. Quite simply, we have to modify the collective subconscious mind and the only way to do that is to place female role models in positions of leadership.
Those role models can be the catalyst for change in the cultural view of the roles of men and women in society, giving rise to equal opportunity for everyone to pursue the occupation of his or her own choosing. The benefits of this sociological change accrue not only to individuals but to organisations, families and the world as a whole.
I look forward to the day when the appointment of a female managing partner is no longer news, but simply a normal activity in the operation of a law firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250