Orrick sees partner profits fall 6% after 2016 hiring spree
US firm posts 1.8% revenue rise as PEP falls despite 8.6% equity reduction
March 10, 2017 at 06:39 AM
4 minute read
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe saw revenue grow 1.8% last year to $929m (£764m), but revenue per lawyer (RPL) and profits per equity partner (PEP) both declined, an outcome that chairman and CEO Mitchell Zuklie attributed partly to a lateral hiring spree by the firm.
With 42 lateral hires – more than twice as many as in 2015 – Orrick's headcount rose 2.7% to 941. RPL dropped 1% to $985,000 (£810,000). And partner profits fell 6.1% to $1.68m (£1.38m), despite an 8.6% decrease in the size of the firm's equity partnership.
"Our revenue didn't match the pace of our headcount growth," Zuklie said. "That's a very conscious choice we made. We thought it was the right time for us to add talent."
The firm's most substantial investment of 2016 was its new office in Houston, which opened in January 2016 and added 21 partners from seven different firms by year's end. Zuklie said Orrick began planning that move about three years ago, around the time that the firm decided to focus on energy and infrastructure as one of its core practice areas.
In May 2016, a four-partner finance team from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer joined Orrick in Paris, a move that was followed by the firm's hire this January of a four-strong Clifford Chance team in the French capital.
During 2016, Orrick also re-hired Melinda Haag, a former partner who returned to the firm as head of its global business litigation group in San Francisco after five years as the region's top federal prosecutor.
"The bottom line is, we saw unusual opportunities," said Zuklie. "We hope it'll lead to a really strong 2017."
Zuklie said the results Orrick achieved for its clients in 2016 seemed to validate its pursuit of those opportunities. The firm worked on about 260 M&A deals, including representing Microsoft on its purchase of Italy's Solair, an Internet of Things platform. The firm also advised Beijing-based internet search provider Baidu in a $150m (£123m) joint investment with Ford in Velodyne LiDAR, a company that makes sensor hardware for self-driving cars.
Orrick grew more in headcount on the transactional side than in litigation last year. Deal work also accounted for more of the firm's gross revenue, Zuklie said. But 2016 wasn't exactly a slow one for the firm's litigators.
In July, Orrick scored a far-reaching privacy win for Microsoft when the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that the federal government could not force the company to turn over customer emails stored on servers outside the country.
Orrick also won two victories for Apple at the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and in October, helped Elon Musk's Space Exploration Technologies beat a sexual harassment suit in Los Angeles.
The first few months of 2017 have brought more changes to Orrick's workforce. The firm unveiled this week its opening of an office in Santa Monica, California, to serve the Silicon Beach technology scene. Orrick also lost the bulk of its capital markets team in Hong Kong, when a nine-partner group decamped for Morgan Lewis & Bockius.
Zuklie said the work the firm had been doing in Hong Kong was not closely tied to any of the three industries it had identified as its focal points, which are energy and infrastructure, finance and technology.
"It's a valuable practice, but not a practice that fits in with the rest of our strategy," said Zuklie, who recently spoke with sibling publication The Asian Lawyer about Orrick's Asia strategy. "We really had honestly hoped to take a strong team and redirect them, but that's not what they wanted to do. That's the nature of having a strategy."
Orrick plans on hiring fewer lawyers in the coming year, though the firm is likely to grow its international arbitration and energy regulatory teams, Zuklie said. He also expects to see financial growth more on par with 2015, when the firm boosted gross revenue by 4.1% and increased PEP by 12.2%.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDoctors and Scientists Lead Climate Protests at Each Magic Circle Firm
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250