Linklaters brings forward new partner election process as it gears up to set new strategy
People, clients and the US on the agenda as Linklaters prepares for strategy talks at Monte Carlo conference
March 17, 2017 at 08:00 AM
3 minute read
Linklaters has brought forward its annual new partner promotion process, so that new partners will be able to attend its partner conference for the first time.
The firm has overhauled the process so that partners now vote on the promotions electronically ahead of the March meeting, enabling those set to join the partnership to attend as partner-elects.
The move, which comes as management prepares to draw up the firm's new strategy, replaces the previous system whereby new partners were voted on at the conference, therefore freeing up more time for discussion.
According to partners, the event, which will be held next weekend in Monte Carlo, is expected to see managing partner Gideon Moore and senior partner Charlie Jacobs discuss a host of issues, from the US to clients, as part of discussions on the firm's future plans.
There have already been months of partnership soundings on the strategy, with Moore leading a wide-ranging consultation exercise among staff. This has seen partners quizzed on a broad spectrum of issues including Linklaters' market position, clients and business development, US coverage, people and technology, and artificial intelligence.
Commenting on the decision to bring the new partner elections forward, one partner said: "Historically, we used to speak about the candidates for a number of hours – it was the most important part of the conference, and it really mattered."
The increasing size and international nature of the firm has made it more difficult to have a discussion about the relative merits of prospective partners, according to others.
A London partner said: "If you are in a smaller partnership you can do it, but we are 450 partners. It is hard to sensibly discuss a German tax partner and question the judgement of the senior partner, the managing partner, the head of the division and the partnership election committee."
The partner said the previous way of doing things had become "a bit of a waste of time" and that it will be much better to have the new partners at the conference "bright-eyed and bushy-tailed".
Partners are expected to be presented with a range of ideas from the sounding exercise at the conference, with a view to formulating a new strategy.
The firm's last annual conference was dominated by the election of new senior partner Jacobs, while at its one-day London conference in October, lockstep reform was the key topic, with partners voting through a package of changes to its remuneration structure.
Partners expect this conference to be less controversial and a chance for the firm's management to build consensus within the partnership.
One partner said: "Compared to last year when lockstep was the main topic of discussion, there is nothing that has people too worked up." The partner added: "Last year there was a lot of navel gazing, but this conference will be much more outwardly focused on clients and developing business, and that is a good thing."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Further Modifies Lockstep to Better Reward Top Performers
2 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readAggressive, Assertive: Is There a Private Equity Lawyer Stereotype, and is it Deterring Talented Juniors?
Trending Stories
- 1TikTok Law and TikTok Politics
- 2California Supreme Court Vacates Murder Conviction in Infant Abuse Case
- 3New York’s Proposed Legislation Restraining Transfer of Real Property
- 4Withers Hires Lawyers, Staff From LA Trusts and Estates Boutique
- 5To Speed Criminal Discovery, NY Bill Proposes Police-to-Prosecutor Pipeline For Records
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250