New law firm leasing in London falls 50% as top firms rethink capital costs
Brexit, tech and flexi-working trends drive 50% drop in London real estate take-up
March 27, 2017 at 11:21 AM
5 minute read
The amount of new London leases taken up by the largest law firms in the capital fell by more than 50% last year, as factors such as flexible working, new technology and the Brexit vote push law firms to rethink their real estate footprint.
According to the report by commercial property company CBRE, which canvassed the largest 100 law firms in London, the total space taken through new London law firm leases in 2016 was 499,900 sq ft – 55% down on 2015 and 36% below the 10-year average.
CBRE senior director Frances Warner Lacey said last year's Brexit vote was a key contributor to the steep drop in demand.
"The EU referendum had a dampening effect; there were a number of law firms that put relocation plans on hold. We are in a landlord-driven market, where lease terms of 15-20 years are required on new developments – that is a long-term commitment to make in an uncertain economic environment."
Business rates may encourage firms to think about cutting back in the areas that are expensive
No law firms signed deals committing them to more than 100,000 sq ft in 2016, in contrast to 2015 when both Ashurst and DLA Piper agreed significant pre-lets. The largest deal of 2016 was CMS's leasing of 84,199 sq ft at Cannon Place ahead of its merger with Nabarro and Olswang, with lawyers from the three firms set to consolidate into one building when the merger goes live in May.
One City partner said that in the aftermath of the Brexit vote, "only an idiot would be expanding their space requirements".
Irrespective of the Brexit vote, law firms have become increasingly cost-conscious with regards to London real estate, as rental costs continue to rise. In addition, this year's business rates revaluation is set to have a major impact on firms, adding £31m to the total occupancy costs for London's 100 largest law firms, according to the report.
Warner Lacey says: "London has become an expensive place to be for a law firm; rental levels in the City have increased by 27% over the last five years, and our research shows that law firms in the capital will be hit by a 19% increase in business rates liability overnight [after] the revaluation on 1 April 2017."
Kennedys real estate partner Dennis Ko commented: "Business rates are a cost that have to be swallowed, but they may encourage firms to look at the space they have and think about cutting back in the areas that are expensive."
Even where firms are signing leasing deals, the amount of space they are taking is falling. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer signed a pre-let agreement for 255,000 sq ft at 100 Bishopsgate in February 2017, a significant reduction on the reported 370,000 sq ft the firm currently occupies in Fleet Street.
Freshfields is one of many firms to have moved staff to offices in cheaper locations outside of London in recent years. The magic circle firm is set to move up to 700 staff to its support centre in Manchester, which opened in 2015, and is also planning to open a second support centre in Toronto.
Increasing numbers of law firms are also adopting flexible and agile working policies to enable them to downsize expensive London premises. According to the report, 30% of the firms surveyed had an agile working policy, while 40% were looking at instituting one in the next 12 months.
Lawyers are the last bastion of the 'corner office as status symbol' culture, but that is starting to break down
Andrew Darwin, COO of DLA Piper's International LLP, said: "When CMS moved into their Cannon Street building they went completely open plan – you are seeing law firms evolving the way they occupy space in a way [that] most other sectors have been through before.
"Lawyers are the last bastion of the 'corner office as status symbol' culture, but that is starting to break down. In the future you will see more flexible use of space and offices with more open areas where people can collaborate more effectively."
One City partner commented: "Good quality City office buildings cost around £55 per sq ft – why would you pay that for your marketing and PR departments when they could be working on their laptops from a Costa?"
Another space-saving tactic increasingly pursued by law firms is moving to open-plan offices, with firms such as CMS, Bird & Bird and Ince & Co among those adopting open-plan configurations in recent years.
According to the CBRE research, in open-plan offices there is an average of one fee earner per 269 sq ft – 40% less than in more traditional layouts, where the average density is one fee earner per 439 sq ft. Firms with traditional office layouts pay an average of £21,247 in rent per fee earner – 35% more than the £13,642 per fee earner paid by law firms with open-plan offices.
"Open plan and agile working are the way forward," said Ko. "We are open plan and have been since we moved into our current HQ in 2008, and agile working is heavily promoted here."
The downsizing trend looks set to continue, as the impact of technology makes it easier for jobs to be handled from cheaper locations or carried out by fewer people.
Hogan Lovells global head of real estate Jackie Newstead said: "Businesses using less space is a trend we will continue to see, as we're just at the start of the artificial intelligence revolution. All businesses, whether lawyers or not, are looking at how much space they need per person."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 2Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 3Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 4Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
- 5Georgia Supreme Court Honoring Troutman Pepper Partner, Former Chief Justice
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250