BT completes review of UK and Ireland advisers with 37 firms appointed
Raft of firms win spots as telecoms giant expands adviser network
April 03, 2017 at 08:17 AM
4 minute read
BT has finalised a review of its UK and Ireland legal advisers, with 37 firms appointed to the new line-up.
The review of what BT describes as its legal 'network' began last summer, after it was delayed due to the merger with EE in January 2016. The new line-up of firms is a significant increase on the previous 19-strong roster announced in 2013.
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer was previously the only magic circle law firm on the roster, but Allen & Overy, Clifford Chance and Linklaters have all now been added.
Other UK top 50 firms to have won places include Addleshaw Goddard, Eversheds Sutherland, Berwin Leighton Paisner, Bond Dickinson, Burges Salmon, DAC Beachcroft, DWF, Fieldfisher, Osborne Clarke, Simmons & Simmons and TLT.
The new appointments will run until April 2020.
BT will also continue to work with a network of alternative legal services providers including Axiom, Halebury, Obelisk, NewGalexy and Lawyers on Demand to meet resourcing, volume and project-based needs.
The process was overseen at first by BT's group director of ethics and compliance, Gareth Tipton, alongside central operations head of suppliers and systems Keith Thomson. Later on in the process, director of international governance Jon Furmston took over from Tipton.
Thomson said: "We realised that we needed to put more discipline into the panel, and although it was firmly managed before we wanted more rigour. The 37 firms are essentially what we want to use and everything we need to service all the parts of the business. We do not expect to use anyone else.
"A lot of the firms on the new panel are not all full service – some are very focused and will deal with very specific requirements. We have a large UK in-house legal team, which is handling more and more work, so many of the firms on the list are there for very specialised work."
Other notable new additions include EY, Baker McKenzie and US immigration specialist firm Fragomen. Reed Smith has been reappointed, while fellow US firm Proskauer Rose, which was also on the previous line-up, has missed out.
Irish firms include newcomer Mason Hayes & Curran and longstanding Irish advisers Matheson and Tughans.
Thomson said: "People in the business all wanted various services, and we had to boil that down into something meaningful. So it was a large tender document, and we looked at a number of factors including reputation, quality of work and we looked at the fees. We were not expecting the fees to have gone down, but we wanted to check that what we are getting is cost-effective.
"We had some advice from outside consultants for the price points for magic circle firms, the regional and the national firms, and that meant we could say 'we think you are a bit higher than what we would expect'. Then there was post-tender negotiations, which were successful off the back of that."
Recent work handled by BT's key advisers has included Freshfields' role on BT's £42m fine from telecoms regulator Ofcom for delays in installing high speed internet lines.
Ofcom's investigation into BT's network arm Openreach found that between January 2013 and December 2014, BT had cut compensation payments to telecoms providers for delays installing the high speed lines. The fine was the biggest ever handed down by the regulator.
Outside of the UK, BT has three distinct regions – the Americas, Europe, and Asia, Middle East and Africa, each of which has a separate legal network.
Full list of panel firms
Addleshaw Goddard Allen & Overy ASB Law Baker McKenzie Berwin Leighton Paisner Bird & Bird Bond Dickinson Burges Salmon Carter-Ruck Cleaver Fulton Rankin Clifford Chance DAC Beachcroft CMS Cameron McKenna DWF Ernst & Young Eversheds Sutherland Fieldfisher Fragomen Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Gateley Kemp Little Lewis Silkin Linklaters Mason Hayes & Curran Matheson MSI Global Alliance Napier & Sons Solicitors Onside Law Osborne Clarke Reed Smith Shepherd & Wedderburn Simmons & Simmons TLT Trowers & Hamlins Tughans Winckworth Sherwood Wright Hassall
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSetting Standards: Vanguard Australia's Sean Hughes on Moving From Government Regulator to Corporate General Counsel
6 minute readNetflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
- 1Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
- 2NY High Court Returns Fired Priest's Discrimination Claim to State Agency
- 3Digging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
- 4Reminder: Court Rules and Statutes Apply to Pendente Lite Custody Decisions
- 5Consumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250