Chadbourne to vote on expelling partner who brought $100m gender bias suit against firm
Female partner's lawyer hits back at "discriminatory and overtly retaliatory act" which "will not disappear with the firm's upcoming merger" with Norton Rose Fulbright
April 05, 2017 at 06:57 PM
4 minute read
Chadbourne & Parke is holding a partnership vote to determine the future of a female partner who filed a $100m gender bias suit against the firm seven months ago.
A spokesman for the US firm, which will merge with Norton Rose Fulbright this quarter, said in a statement that a partnership meeting will be scheduled to "consider and vote upon a motion to expel Kerrie Campbell from the partnership".
The firm, as it has stated in court filings, noted that Campbell was asked by Chadbourne's management committee to leave voluntarily last year.
Chadbourne, in its statement, cited Campbell's alleged "questionable legal judgement, her serious and disruptive failures in practice management, and her displaying poor personal judgement, among other things", as necessitating her departure from the firm. Chadbourne said it tried to extricate Campbell from its ranks in a quiet manner in order to allow her to "achieve better results with a fresh start" somewhere else.
"She decided not to do so and, instead, chose to pursue baseless claims in the cynical pursuit of a big and undeserved payday," said Chadbourne. "The firm has been exceedingly patient and sought to avoid having a formal expulsion vote if other outcomes were possible.
"As Chadbourne prepares for a new future, the choices Ms Campbell has made have left the firm no alternative but to seek to bring this relationship to an end in this manner. No matter how she will try to mischaracterise it, this decision is the inevitable result of the choices Ms Campbell has made."
David Sanford, a name partner at Sanford Heisler representing Campbell, said in a statement of his own that Chadbourne had hit a "new low" by publicly announcing the potential dismissal of his client from its partnership.
"By calling the planned expulsion vote 'the inevitable result of the choices Ms Campbell has made' in bringing suit against the firm, Chadbourne openly admits that the vote to terminate Ms Campbell is retaliatory," Sanford said.
"Unfortunately for Norton Rose Fulbright, this discriminatory and overtly retaliatory act is a liability that will not disappear with the firm's upcoming merger. We will pursue discovery to determine Norton Rose Fulbright's role in directing or approving Ms Campbell's expulsion."
Two spokesmen for Norton Rose Fulbright did not return requests for comment on the matter. A call to Campbell at her office in Washington DC was not immediately returned by the time of this story.
Campbell, who joined Chadbourne in early 2014 in a lateral move from Manatt Phelps & Phillips, has since been joined in her suit against Chadbourne by former Kiev office managing partner Jaroslawa Zelinsky Johnson and ex-products liability chair Mary Yelenick, now of counsel at Chadbourne after retiring from the firm's partnership in December.
Yelenick, in a declaration filed last month in a New York federal court, attacked Chadbourne's origination credit system as being inherently unfair to women partners.
A letter filed in the suit Wednesday by Yelenick, Johnson and Campbell states that "the parties have been unable to reach a settlement" and that "litigation remains ongoing".
US District Judge J Paul Oetken has yet to rule on Chadbourne's motion to dismiss the case and request for summary judgment, or the plaintiffs' request for class certification and Campbell's bid to scuttle counterclaims filed against her by Chadbourne.
Proskauer Rose, which in 2013 settled a case filed against the firm by a client of Sanford's, is representing Chadbourne in its dispute with Campbell, Johnson and Yelenick.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeigh Day Defeats Eversheds to Win Equal Pay Award For Next Employees
Trending Stories
- 1Lawyers' Reenactment Footage Leads to $1.5M Settlement
- 2People in the News—Feb. 4, 2025—McGuireWoods, Barley Snyder
- 3Eighth Circuit Determines No Standing for Website User Concerned With Privacy Who Challenged Session-Replay Technology
- 4Superior Court Re-examines Death of a Party Pending a Divorce Action
- 5Chicago Law Requiring Women, Minority Ownership Stake in Casinos Is Unconstitutional, New Suit Claims
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250