Asia M&A activity declines as China outbound deals dry up
League tables show drop in M&A deals during first quarter, both by deal count and volume
April 17, 2017 at 04:46 PM
4 minute read
Big-ticket M&A slowed down significantly in the Asia-Pacific region in the first quarter of 2017.
According to league tables published by Mergermarket, Bloomberg and Thomson Reuters, M&A deals during the first three months of this year declined both by deal count and volume.
While most of Asia saw a drop, four Indian firms made the top 10 legal advisers for M&A deals by volume, thanks to the $12.7bn sale of Vodafone Group's Indian business to Mumbai-based carrier Idea Cellular, the largest M&A deal announced in the first three months of 2017.
The quartet that played lead roles on the deal are: S&R Associates, AZB & Partners, Vaish Associates, and Bharucha & Partners.
Slaughter and May, which is also acting for Vodafone, topped both Bloomberg and Thomson Reuters' rankings for M&A deals by deal volume. Mergermarket ranked Slaughters second after King & Wood Mallesons. The rest of the top 20 varies greatly among the three organisations' league tables, as different deals were included based on different methodologies.
Despite the difference in rankings, all three reported a slowdown in Asia-Pacific M&A deals during the first three months of this year. According to Mergermarket, the Asia-Pacific region excluding Japan saw 697 deals announced in the first quarter, worth a total value of $124.8bn – 120 fewer deals by deal count than the same period last year. And the value is down by $14.5bn, or 10.4%, compared with the same period last year.
Bloomberg reported a 14.3% drop, to $174.2bn in total deal value, the lowest since the third quarter of 2014. Thomson Reuters, whose rankings included more deals, said the year-on-year deal value decrease reached 31%.
The decline was in part due to a visible drop in Chinese outbound acquisitions, a theme that dominated last year's Asia M&A market. After a record-breaking year of Chinese overseas M&A, the Chinese government imposed a series of measures to curtail capital outflow toward the end of 2016, in order to stabilise its currency's exchange rate against the dollar and other foreign currencies.
Meanwhile, the US government has vowed to adopt tougher regulatory scrutiny of Chinese-led acquisitions, especially in areas where national security might come into play. Measures from both sides have resulted in Chinese investors retreating from overseas deals this year.
Mergermarket reported that 75 Chinese outbound deals with a total value of $11.8bn were announced in the first quarter of 2017, a steep drop from the 96 deals worth $82bn during the same period of 2016. Last year's total deal value was significantly boosted by ChemChina's $43bn planned acquisition of Syngenta. The deal, first announced in February 2016, received long-awaited approval from the Chinese Ministry of Commerce this week, clearing a major regulatory hurdle.
Still, Bloomberg said the Greater China region is still the most sought after for transactions, accounting for more than half (53%) of all deals in the region. The slowdown in outbound deals also made investors turn to domestic targets. Bloomberg noted that 96% of the Greater China deals it recorded in the first quarter were domestic deals. Mergermarket reported a similar pattern within the region, noting that transactions between two Asian parties accounted for 93% of the total deal value of $124.8bn.
Following a strong 2016, the Japanese M&A market also saw a downturn on the previous year. Thomson Reuters recorded deals worth $30.5bn in total value involving Japanese parties, down 27% year on year and the slowest first quarter since 2013. Six deals were valued at $1bn or more, according to Thomson Reuters data; all but one were outbound deals. Takeda Pharmaceutical's $5.2bn acquisition of cancer drugmaker Ariad Pharmaceuticals was the largest deal announced.
Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison – Ariad's counsel in the Takeda deal – Morrison & Foerster, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett and Sullivan & Cromwell were among the firms leading the rankings of Japan deals.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGBC and Linklaters Advise on Talabat’s $2BN IPO in World’s Largest Tech IPO of 2024
2 minute readLatham, Skadden Among Firms Acting on Mubadala's $3.4 B Acquisition of CI Financial
3 minute readLatham, Jones Day and Wachtell Lead on Anglo American's $3.8B Coal Business Sale
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1ClaimClam Wanted to Boost Class Action Claims Rates. But Judges and Attorneys Fought Back
- 2'We Will Sue ... Immediately': AG Bonta Says He's Ready to Spend $25M Battling Trump
- 311 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
- 4In-House Moves of Month: Discover Fills Awkward CLO Opening, Allegion GC Lasts Just 3 Months
- 5Delaware Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250