Linklaters scraps individual partner targets in effort to boost focus on teamwork
Annual partner reviews to be ditched in favour of more regular feedback
April 19, 2017 at 10:41 AM
3 minute read
Linklaters is moving away from individual financial targets for partners, in a bid to improve teamwork at the magic circle firm.
The overhaul – which was presented to the firm's partnership at its recent partnership meeting in Monaco – will see partner performance assessed by considering a broader range of factors encompassing business development, marketing and innovation, rather than a sole focus on individual billings.
The move is aimed at boosting revenues by fostering a more entrepreneurial spirit and encouraging partners to collaborate, rather than focus on their own financial targets.
Additionally, annual partner reviews will be ditched in favour of more regular feedback from sector or geography leaders, with the firm aiming to encourage more regular conversations between sectors and practices.
The shakeup comes after a wide-ranging strategy consultation exercise within the firm, which took place in the run up to its annual partner conference at the end of March.
The review, led by managing partner Gideon Moore, involved widespread soundings among the firm and its clients on the future direction of the firm. The move is particularly significant for Linklaters given its historic focus on individual partner performance and billing targets, much of which was instilled by former managing partner Tony Angel.
Moore commented: "Following an extensive and collaborative process, involving more than 100 clients and 2,000 of our people across the world, one of the key pillars of our Strategy Refresh is that we are keen for our teams and practices to feel motivated and encouraged to present the whole firm's offering to clients.
"As part of our implementation of that strategy, we are removing the barriers that stop us from acting as a united team: recognising total partner contribution to the firm rather than focusing on individual metrics. It's a move that will allow us to be agile and flexible, as well as ensuring clients receive the very highest level of service."
The move follows a decision at Linklaters' last conference in November to reform its lockstep model, moving from a ladder that typically topped out at 25 points over 10 years to one that reached 50 points over a 12-year period. The new lockstep system takes effect in May.
Moore took over as Linklaters managing partner last year, with corporate heavyweight Charlie Jacobs stepping into the senior partner role.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250