Linklaters to make long-awaited China law move with new Shanghai spin-off
Nineteen-strong team to launch new 'best friends' firm in Shanghai Free Trade Zone
April 24, 2017 at 09:43 AM
3 minute read
Linklaters is set to make its long-awaited move into Chinese law with a team of almost 20 lawyers breaking off to set up a new 'best friends' firm in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone (FTZ).
Three partners and 16 lawyers are leaving Linklaters' China offices to set up the new independent firm, which will operate alongside Linklaters on a 'best friends' basis, an agreement that is expected to be finalised in the next two to three months.
Under Chinese regulations, international law firms are only permitted to open representative offices in the country, and are restricted from offering Chinese law advice. However, the Shanghai FTZ scheme, which was launched in 2013, enables foreign firms to offer Chinese law advice via an association with a local firm or by setting up an independent practice in the FTZ.
During 2014 and 2015, Linklaters explored the possibility of tying up with an existing Chinese firm, but subsequently made the decision to push ahead with the 'greenfield' option of setting up its own independent firm, at its partner conference in Berlin last year.
Linklaters managing partner Gideon Moore said: "We are up and running now – we have got all of the necessary authorisations and we have got a group of partners who have moved over into the new setup.
"We are now able to say to clients: if the matter requires PRC law capability, why don't we use this firm?
"Our Chinese lawyers are really pleased about the prospects of being able to go back and do what they were trained to do, which is deliver Chinese law. Our clients benefit from the fact that they have been trained in the Linklaters way and understand the expectations of international clients, so you are getting the best of both worlds."
Linklaters China COO Chris Holt added: "We continue to pursue our aspiration to provide clients with access to a dedicated PRC law capability in China. Once the detailed discussions have concluded we will officially launch the best friends relationship. We hope to do this in the next two to three months.
"We expect to see stable and sustainable growth in China over the long term. Market shifts have indicated that outbound work and high-end domestic transactions will become ever more important for our business. We believe that being able to offer integrated Chinese and international law advice will help us to protect our competitive advantage both in China and globally."
Other firms with a presence in the Shanghai FTZ include Baker McKenzie, which became the first international firm to make such a move in 2015 by agreeing a joint operation with Chinese firm FenXun Partners.
Holman Fenwick Willan entered into an association with Chinese firm Wintell & Co last year, while Hogan Lovells became the third firm to take advantage of the new regulations after agreeing a formal association with FTZ firm Fidelity last October.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic about M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readThe Law Firms Generating 8-Figure Fees on the Year's Big Ticket UK Deals
3 minute read'Significant' Competition Concerns Over £762M GXO Logistics-Wincanton Merger
Trending Stories
- 1High-flying Genetics Testing Firm GeneDx Hires Ex-Zoetis GC as Legal Chief
- 2Manhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
- 3Deposing Former Mayor Bill de Blasio; Misrepresentations To Induce Investment: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
- 4Which Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
- 5Two Tesla Shareholder Cases in Del. Chancery Court Consolidated
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250