SRA scraps training contract and LPC requirements under new qualifying exam
Overhaul of legal training will see Solicitor's Qualification Examination introduced in 2020
April 25, 2017 at 08:12 AM
3 minute read
Aspiring lawyers will be required to pass a new qualifying exam and will no longer need to complete the Legal Practice Course (LPC), under an overhaul of legal training announced by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).
The SRA confirmed today (25 April) that from 2020, the new Solicitor's Qualification Examination (SQE) will replace the current system of qualification, removing the requirement to complete the LPC.
The implementation date will be no earlier than September 2020, to allow all affected parties time to prepare for the changes.
The SQE will be split into two stages, the first of which will focus on functioning legal knowledge – including professional conduct, commercial and corporate law, and dispute resolution – with the second covering practical legal skills such as drafting, interviewing and oral communication.
Trainee solicitors will also no longer be required to complete training contracts – instead, they will need to complete at least two years of "qualifying legal work experience". This experience can be covered by as many as four different employers, including a university – for example, working for a university law clinic. Paralegal work can also count towards the work experience requirement.
The SRA is expecting that candidates will take stage one of the SQE before their work-based experience, and SQE stage two at the end of their work experience.
Under the new system, if candidates do not have a degree they will be able qualify if they have an equivalent qualification or equivalent experience.
The introduction of the SQE has been motivated in part by a desire to remove the burden of large upfront costs taken on by students for the LPC, which can cost as much as £15,000.
SRA chief executive Paul Philip said: "We all need to be able to trust that those who enter the profession are fit to practise. The current system cannot provide that confidence. The new SQE will provide assurance that all those who qualify, regardless of pathway or background, meet the consistent high standards we set on behalf of the public."
SRA director of education and training Julie Brannan added: "This will replace the requirement to do a qualifying law degree and an LPC. Instead, what people will have is a degree or equivalent qualification, and they will complete a substantial period of work experience. The strong view from the consultation was that two years was appropriate, but it will be more flexible than what we have at the moment.
"The SQE assesses core knowledge and frees up law firms and universities to design their own specialist training."
The SQE has been in development for the past 18 months, with a second consultation on the proposals launched in October 2016 after responses to the first, in December 2015, led to amendments.
The first consultation received more than 240 formal responses, while the second garnered 253. The proposals have met with some resistance, with more than half of respondents to the most recent consultation disagreeing that the SQE is "a robust and effective measure of competence", including 37% who "strongly" disagree.
The SRA is now looking for an assessment organisation to handle the SQE, with a tender process expected to be launched before the summer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Further Modifies Lockstep to Better Reward Top Performers
2 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readAggressive, Assertive: Is There a Private Equity Lawyer Stereotype, and is it Deterring Talented Juniors?
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250