Law firms braced for 'disruptive' demands of SRA's new qualifying 'super exam'
Qualification overhaul prompts concerns over impact on specialist training for City law firms
April 26, 2017 at 09:57 AM
4 minute read
The news that the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is pushing ahead with sweeping changes to legal training has provoked concerns among City law firms about the potentially "disruptive" impact of the overhaul.
The SRA has announced that the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) – dubbed by some as 'the super exam' – will come into use after September 2020, replacing the current system of qualification, with the Legal Practice Course (LPC) phased out.
The SQE will be split into two stages, with the first stage – which will be carried out before the beginning of a training contract – focusing on functioning legal knowledge, covering commercial and corporate, dispute resolution, property, wills and criminal law.
Key areas of concern include lingering uncertainty over whether the new regime will provide the specialist training required by many big firms. Without the LPC, will trainees be adequately prepared for the demands of City law?
BPP University Law School CEO Peter Crisp (pictured above) comments: "The implications are profound – the LPC is the gold standard for the profession. It will make a big change to how solicitors qualify. No law firm wants a trainee arriving on day one of their training contract knowing less than they know now, and with fewer skills.
"At the moment, the detail is shaky. A lot of our clients want technical training in corporate finance, legal writing and practical legal research, which appear to be absent. We will have to devise programmes for the SQE to cover the rigour of law practice in the City."
RPC graduate recruitment partner Simon Hart adds: "With the form that stage 1 of the SQE takes, there may be additional modules that students who are taking up training contracts in the City will have to take. I'm sure there will be additional costs [for law firms].
"The devil is in the detail of the precise curriculum and range of topics, but I think some of the more commercial aspects of the curriculum will probably need extending by additional modules. For City-based practice areas, some areas of finance and corporate areas may well need additional modules."
The phase-out of the LPC raises the possibility for aspiring lawyers to shave off one year from the typical six-year route to qualification, provided universities incorporate SQE training into law degrees. Alternatively, law schools may now develop postgraduate training courses to help students prepare for the SQE before they begin their training contracts.
Eversheds Sutherland graduate recruitment partner Ian Gascoigne comments: "Unless a particular law degree combines teaching in both aspects, we envisage that a preparatory course will be essential, and will be looking closely to see what the legal education providers develop in this area. "
Meanwhile, the timing of stage two of the SQE – which is expected to take place at the end of the training contract – is also likely to raise logistical issues for City law firms, given that trainees may have to take time out to prepare for the final exam.
Hart says: "Ultimately, we have to work out what the transition arrangements are – we will have to slightly review the two-year training experience and work out how we integrate training for SQE2. Some trainees do international secondments for six months – how do you have them doing exams out of the country?"
Gascoigne adds: "The addition of SQE2 into the training period is a significant change for law firms. Unlike the current Professional Skills Course, SQE2 will be more disruptive because skills will be rigorously examined during training period."
Hogan Lovells associate director of legal resourcing Clare Harris adds: "We will want to see what is proposed for the assessment – that's the big unknown at the heart of this announcement."
Crisp says BPP will contact law firms again when the SRA confirms more details about the new assessment. Currently, more than 60 law firms send all their trainees exclusively to BPP for LPC and GDL training where appropriate.
"We have been consulting with firms, and will go out and see them again when we have flesh on the bones of all of this. We expect they will want trainees to have the same rigorous training and that we will need to devise programmes that do the best SQE.
"I feel this is a bit like Brexit. None of us think it is a good idea, but the decision has been made, so we are getting on with it."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Further Modifies Lockstep to Better Reward Top Performers
2 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readHow Many Legal Jobs Will be Affected by AI? Law Firms Can't Agree
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250