Research highlights handful of top schools disproportionately dominating law firm recruitment
Former pupils from 10 leading schools are 100 times more likely to apply to firms than peers at worst performing schools
May 09, 2017 at 12:28 PM
2 minute read
Pupils from 10 leading private and grammar schools are 100 times more likely to apply for prestigious law firm graduate schemes than those educated at the bottom 10% of schools, according to new analysis sponsored by Clifford Chance (CC).
New research from specialist recruitment company Rare, whose Contextual Recruitment System (CRS) was launched two years ago by founder Raphael Mokades (pictured) and is now being used by 27 law firms, highlights the disparity in application numbers from those at leading selective schools and the worst performing schools.
Looking at the total number of applications to more than 30 City graduate schemes – including all of its law firm clients as well as names including Boston Consultancy Group, Deloitte and Barclays – Rare found that 3% of them came from former students of just 10 'super schools'.
The schools – nine selective, fee-paying schools including Eton, Westminster and Haberdashers' Aske's Schools, plus one grammar (Queen Elizabeth's in Barnet) – represent just 0.3% of the total school population between them.
According to Mokades, the research also suggests that grammar schools could hinder applications, finding that students from comprehensive schools in areas where grammar schools are present are significantly less likely to apply to top firms, even at comprehensives that outperform grammars.
It also shows how proximity to opportunity and outreach from firms increases the number of applications to leading firms, with rural and coastal areas of Britain producing the fewest applications.
So far, the entire magic circle is using CRS, as well as firms including Hogan Lovells, Herbert Smith Freehills, Berwin Leighton Paisner and Ashurst.
CRS can be used by law firms in conjunction with their existing application processes to make it easier to identify talented students from less privileged backgrounds by showing their results in the context of their school and upbringing.
The initiative was initially launched in 2013-14, in partnership with CC and Oxford University.
Those using CRS are able to see an applicant's GCSE and A-level results in the context of the performance of their whole school, meaning it is immediately obvious when their results may be lower than a rival candidate's but their achievement may have been greater.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDoctors and Scientists Lead Climate Protests at Each Magic Circle Firm
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250