US employment law giant launches in the UK with London merger deal
Littler Mendelson follows moves into Germany and France with GQ Employment Law tie-up
May 09, 2017 at 07:00 AM
6 minute read
US employment law firm Littler Mendelson is launching in the UK via a tie-up with 16-lawyer boutique GQ Employment Law.
The move marks Littler's third European deal in the past 18 months, after it combined with Germany's Vangard in late 2015 – a move that gave the US firm its first presence outside the Americas – and 170-lawyer French labour law specialist Fromont Briens last October.
The 1,200-lawyer firm – which last year posted revenues of $530m (£410m) - now has one of the largest specialist employment practices in Europe, with more than 200 lawyers across offices in Berlin, Duesseldorf, Hamburg, Munich, Paris, Lyon and London.
Littler co-managing director Jeremy Roth told The American Lawyer that the move, which followed six months of negotiations, was "an important step" in the continued development of the firm's international network and that the UK is a key market for its clients.
The deal will see GQ join Littler's international verein, which it established in 2013 to facilitate its combinations with Costa Rica-based BDS and Colombia's Godoy Cordoba, where the firm now has more than 70 lawyers. All of Littler's international offices are members of its verein, Littler Global, except for its bases in Canada, Mexico and Venezuela, which form part of its US partnership.
GQ – which was founded in 2010 and was last year shortlisted for Specialist Law Firm of the Year at the British Legal Awards - will retain its existing ownership and management structure, with co-founder Jon Gilligan remaining in place as managing partner.
Roth said Littler's less formalised managerial structure means that no individual GQ partner will have a formal firmwide management position, but he added that the UK practice will have representation on its global executive committee and will be a "key part" of strategic decision-making.
GQ advises UK and international companies on a range of contentious and non-contentious employment issues, from partnership and contract disputes to workforce policies and white-collar crime. The firm was founded in 2010 by former Linklaters employment lawyers Gilligan and Paul Quain, who recently spent time in Germany and France in order to build relationships with the Littler Global practices in those countries. The three teams have already worked together on live client matters, Roth said.
Gilligan said he came up with the idea to establish GQ during a three-year stint as in-house counsel at the investment banking division of Royal Bank of Scotland, which spanned the financial crisis. "It was a pretty interesting time to be there," he said. "I got a lot of experience of getting employment advice from full-service firms where employment law wasn't a priority. There aren't that many employment boutiques in London and those that do exist are mainly focused on high-wealth individuals and small companies. Speaking to Paul [Quain], we realised there was a real opportunity to do something different for big international companies."
Roth said the same reasoning led Littler to initially expand beyond the US, after it experienced a "lack of integration" in law firm alliance networks. "We were in one of the alliances for a number of years and while it had some benefit in helping us understand the global market, frankly, a [global firm approach] is a better model for clients," he said. "Global clients are looking for a coordinated, integrated global partner; they're not looking for a roster of firms on a country-by-country basis."
While a more conventional approach for a US-based law firm seeking to develop a European network firm may be to start with London rather than Germany and France, Roth said Littler's niche practice means it has been able to follow a different path. "Most of the US firms that come to Europe have big transactional practices and focus on London because it's a key financial market," he said. "We're chasing employers, not capital markets, so we go wherever companies have lots of labour issues."
The UK has been on Littler's radar for several years, however, and Roth feels that employment lawyers are particularly well placed to capitalise on the ongoing disruption caused by the country's decision to leave the European Union. "Anytime there's dramatic change in a market, there's an opportunity for employment lawyers," he said. "We've already seen that in the US with the Trump administration, and we're going to see it in Europe with Brexit."
The addition of the UK to the firm's existing offices in France and Germany – two of the markets most likely to benefit from any Brexit-related fallout from London, particularly in financial services – means Littler is now "in a great position to help employers navigate that uncertainty", Roth said.
The tie-up with GQ continues a period of extraordinary international expansion for Littler. The firm has now launched in no fewer than 14 markets since October 2013, including Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, France, Germany, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, Puerto Rico, the UK and Venezuela.
Roth said the firm plans to further develop its global network, with Argentina and Chile at the top of its agenda. "I've had my eye on opportunities in both countries, but so far they haven't panned out," he said.
Littler also intends to develop its Canadian offering, having established a Toronto outpost in August 2015 with the hire of seven lawyers – including four partners – from Cassels Brock & Blackwell and local boutique Kuretzky Vassos Henderson.
Roth said one side-effect of Littler's recent trailblazing is that its growing international profile has led to increasing numbers of firms making unprompted contact to propose combinations, with the US outfit fielding recent enquiries from Italy and Spain. "We get called up a lot by people asking when we're going to show up in their country and if they can join when we do, but it needs to be the perfect alignment of the right jurisdiction, the right practice and the right people," he said.
"The worst thing we could do as a law firm is get that wrong – that would risk our reputation and our relationship with our clients. So I can't tell you what's next, but I can say that there will be a next."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeigh Day Defeats Eversheds to Win Equal Pay Award For Next Employees
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250