'The canary in the mine has died' - US partners react to Trump's firing of FBI director Comey
Decision marks only the second time an FBI director has been fired by the US president in more than three decades
May 10, 2017 at 05:23 AM
4 minute read
US President Donald Trump has fired FBI director James Comey, citing his handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email server.
The sudden news, announced via a White House press release, shocked lawmakers, political pundits and the legal community.
"This is big news. Big news," said Stephen Ryan, a partner at McDermott Will & Emery and a former federal prosecutor in Washington. "I don't think he had the confidence of the American public anymore. In truth, it was probably time for him to go, although this is quite abrupt and interesting in itself."
Dechert partner David Kelley, Comey's successor as US attorney for the Southern District of New York, said simply in an email: "The canary in the mine has died."
A memo from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said Comey was "wrong to usurp" the attorney general's authority last July when he announced the closure of the agency's Clinton investigation. Rosenstein's letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions also said Comey "ignored another longstanding principle" by holding a press conference to "release derogatory information" about Clinton.
"The director laid out his version of the facts for the news media as if it were a closing argument, but without a trial," Rosenstein wrote. "It is a textbook example of what federal prosecutors and agents are taught not to do."
The letter further criticised Comey's decision in October, shortly before the election, to tell Congress that the investigation had been reopened to search more emails. Rosenstein's memo quoted criticism of Comey – tied to his handling of the Clinton emails investigation – from former top Justice Department officials including Jamie Gorelick and Larry Thompson.
Following Comey's termination, Andrew McCabe, his deputy, became acting FBI director. "Some people ask me whether I walked away from my law degree when I came into law enforcement, but it couldn't be further from the truth," McCabe said in April.
Ryan said picking the next director will be "absolutely critical". He suggested a pick from the judiciary or a career prosecutor, someone "who's neither red or blue".
"Anyone with a partisan political career is not appropriate," Ryan said.
Liberal advocacy groups and Democrats urged further scrutiny of Comey's termination. New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said the firing threatened "both critical investigations now underway, and the integrity and independence of the FBI".
The 10-year terms of FBI directors "were purposefully structured to span across sitting presidents to ensure the FBI's independence and insulate the bureau from partisan politics," said Anthony Romero, the American Civil Liberties Union executive director, in a statement.
"President Trump's dismissal of Comey raises questions about the administration's inappropriate meddling in bureau operations – precisely at a time when the bureau appears to be investigating the president, his advisers, and his campaign for potential collusion with Russian agents in our last election."
Comey, a former deputy attorney general who left the Justice Department in 2005, joined Lockheed Martin as senior vice-president and general counsel. "I have the best general counsel's job in America and I didn't have to move to Chicago to get it," Comey once remarked.
He had been general counsel to hedge fund Bridgewater Associates in Connecticut before his nomination to lead the FBI. In March 2013, Comey was appointed to the board of HSBC Holdings.
Comey's actions may weigh heavy on his future employment prospects, as big law firms may be wary of questions that would accompany his hiring. Still, as a prominent lawyer with high-level experience in government and business, he may find a home at a law firm, as some other former FBI directors have.
Robert Mueller, who left the FBI in 2013, joined Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr in Washington a year later; while Louis Freeh, who was the FBI director from September 1993 to May 2001, later founded US law firm Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan.
Andrew Denney in New York and Mike Scarcella in Washington contributed to this report.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Among Those Convicted as Hong Kong High Court Sentences 45 Activists to Prison
Clifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute read'Get Your House in Order' SFO Warns Corporates, as UK Government Issues Long-Awaited Fraud Guidance
Trending Stories
- 1High-flying Genetics Testing Firm GeneDx Hires Ex-Zoetis GC as Legal Chief
- 2Manhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
- 3Deposing Former Mayor Bill de Blasio; Misrepresentations To Induce Investment: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
- 4Which Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
- 5Two Tesla Shareholder Cases in Del. Chancery Court Consolidated
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250