Slaughters freezes pay for London associates after overhaul of pay and benefits
Magic circle firm opts against associate salary hikes for 2017-18 after earlier increases
June 09, 2017 at 07:00 AM
2 minute read
Slaughter and May has opted against increasing London associate pay for 2017-18, after significantly hiking salaries at the start of the year.
Slaughters raised London associate salaries by up to 10% as of 1 January, in a one-off move outside of the firm's regular annual pay review.
A firm spokesperson confirmed: "We are not proposing a further change at this time. It is our intention, however, to keep our scales under review.
"Our associate remuneration is distributed in a way that mirrors the flat lockstep of the firm's partnership and reflects the strong collective belief in Slaughter and May's distinctive no billable hours targets culture."
This January's increases saw newly qualified (NQ) pay rise by 9% to £78,000, while lawyers with one year's post-qualification experience (PQE) saw the biggest rise, with a 10% hike to £87,000. The hikes came alongside the introduction of a wide-ranging overhaul of pay and benefits at the firm, which saw it move away from performance-based pay, a decision that senior partner Steve Cooke said "clearly differentiates" the firm from its competitors.
At the same time, Slaughters also introduced a raft of new reforms, including the introduction of 30 days' annual paid holiday, a four-week paid sabbatical for associates when they reach three years' PQE, and the opportunity for all associates to work from home one day a week.
Slaughters has reviewed associate pay annually in May since 2012, when it dropped its longstanding biannual pay review system.
Separately, RollonFriday has reported that Clifford Chance has handed out an inflation-matching pay hike of 2.7%. The firm declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK Solicitors Regulator Sets Unusual Practice Conditions on AIG In-House Lawyer
Insurance Practice DWF Takes Team of 53 Lawyers From Australian Firm
2 minute readA&O Shearman, White & Case Advise on €1.2B Public Takeover of German Steel Giant Salzgitter
3 minute readResolute Mining Appoints London General Counsel—CEO Resigns Following Foreign Detention
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250