Norton Rose-Chadbourne combination faces delay due to client conflicts
Transatlantic tie-up had been expected to go live by end of month
June 14, 2017 at 07:07 AM
2 minute read
Norton Rose Fulbright's merger with Chadbourne & Parke is facing delays due to client conflicts.
The two firms announced the tie-up in February, but did not give a specific date, only saying that they would combine in the second quarter of 2017.
However, with the end of Q2 now just two weeks away, a go-live date is yet to be set.
Norton Rose Fulbright chief executive Peter Martyr said: "The combination process included an in-depth review of potential conflicts. We have identified very few material conflicts and are working to resolve these.
"We expect our proposed combination with Chadbourne & Parke to enhance our capabilities and add tremendous value to our collective clients. As we are in the process of working through the technicalities of bringing both firms together, it is premature to discuss any further at this stage. An update will be provided in due course."
One partner at the firm said partners had been informed that the tie-up was expected to go through in Q2 this year. He added: "It was always expected to be sometime imminently now," adding that if it went through in the next three or four weeks, "it wouldn't be particularly delayed".
It is understood that project finance is among the groups affected by client conflicts.
The deal will be Norton Rose's second US merger following its tie-up with Texas-headquartered Fulbright & Jaworski in 2013.
However, a number of Chadbourne lawyers have opted against the merger, and this week, Covington & Burling announced the hire of a team of 15 Chadbourne lawyers, including two London international partners, after recruiting a four-partner project finance team from the firm earlier this year.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEU Parliament Gives Blessing to New EU Competition Chief Ribera Rodríguez
2 minute readTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for Hard-Line Approach to Region
Trending Stories
- 1Another Senior Boeing Attorney Exits, This One for CLO Post at Jet-Maintenance Company
- 2Bridge the Communication Gap: The Benefits of Having (and Being) a Bilingual Mediator
- 3CFIUS Is Locked and Loaded, but What Lies Ahead for CFIUS Enforcement Activity?
- 4Deluge of Trump-Leary Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
- 59 Attorneys Sanctioned in Texas
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250