Clifford Chance under investigation by the SRA over Excalibur case
Magic circle firm faces regulatory scrutiny over role in long-running case
July 06, 2017 at 08:57 AM
2 minute read
Clifford Chance (CC) is being investigated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) over its controversial role in the long-running Excalibur case.
CC has turned to Clyde & Co for advice on the SRA investigation, which was reported earlier this morning by Financial News.
The firm has already faced significant scrutiny over its involvement in the $1.6bn case, which was brought by Excalibur Ventures, an aspiring oil exploration firm, against two US oil companies – Gulf Keystone Petroleum and Texas Keystone.
The claim was backed by a group of litigation funders, including the now disbanded BlackRobe Capital Partners, New York-based hedge fund Platinum Capital Partners and a UK entity called Psari Holdings, which was controlled by Greek shipping magnates Adonis and Filippos Lemos.
A 2013 High Court judgment found that the funders were liable for the defence costs of the two defendants, a ruling that was upheld by the Court of Appeal (CoA) last November.
CC was criticised by the CoA for its role advising Excalibur, after it emerged that there were family ties between CC's lead partner, Alex Panayides, and one of the litigation funders.
Panayides' father had been chairman of one of the Lemos family's ship management companies, while his brother was a "longstanding and trusted" employee of a Lemos family company.
In December 2015, it was reported that CC had settled a professional negligence claim by the Lemos family, who argued that CC had overstated the case's chance of success. The family put in £13.75m of funding.
While the SRA regularly investigates individual lawyers, it is less common for the watchdog to probe major law firms.
For example, the SRA referred three Clydes partners to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal for breaching money laundering rules earlier this year. The trio were each fined £10,000.
News of CC's investigation comes after the firm posted double-digit increases in both revenue and profit per equity partner (PEP) yesterday (6 July), taking both metrics to new highs for the firm.
Turnover climbed 11% to £1.54bn, with PEP soaring by 12% to an average of £1.38m against almost static equity partner count.
CC, the SRA and Clyde & Co all declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250