BBC report reveals details of pay for senior in-house lawyers
Annual report includes details of salaries paid to group GC and two other top lawyers
July 19, 2017 at 09:15 AM
2 minute read
The BBC's annual report, which has revealed details of the salaries paid to its biggest stars, has also shed light on the earnings of the corporation's top lawyers.
The report, published today (19 July), lists all BBC executives paid more than £150,000, including group general counsel Sarah Jones, head of legal Peter Farrell and assistant general counsel Peter Ranyard.
Jones, who earns between £200,000 and £249,999, has been group GC at the BBC since 2012. She joined from Allen & Overy in 1996 and has been in her position throughout various controversies for the broadcaster, including the fallout from the Jimmy Savile abuse scandal.
Farrell and Ranyard, meanwhile, are both paid between £150,000 and £199,999.
Farrell arrived at the BBC in 2006 as head of property legal, before which he was of counsel at legacy firm Lovells, where he acted for clients including the BBC.
Ranyard, who has specific responsibility for the commercial legal, fair trading and competition, and technology legal teams, joined the BBC in 2001 from legacy firm Pinsents, where he was a partner.
The report has raised uncomfortable questions for the BBC with regards to its gender pay policy. Of the 96 individuals earning more than £150,000, only 34 are women, with pay for the top male earner – Chris Evans, on £2.2m-£2.25m – far outstripping that of the top female earner, Claudia Winkleman, who takes home £450,000-£499,999.
The BBC was required to name all employees and presenters paid more than £150,000 by a new Royal Charter introduced by the government last year.
The disclosures come amid a wider push for gender pay transparency in the corporate sphere. In April, new regulations for UK companies were introduced that will require those with more than 250 employees to publish details of the pay gap between their male and female employees. Employers have 12 months to publish key information, including the proportion of men and women in each quarter of their pay structure.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNetflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Report Spotlights Bullying, Harassment Facing In-House Lawyers
Australian Gambling Machine Giant Hires Insider as CLO, Relocates Her to Las Vegas
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250