Addleshaw Goddard PEP plunges 25% as top of equity falls by nearly £350,000
Firm hit by steep drop in profit after a record year in 2015-16 when it gained fee uplift from past cases
August 04, 2017 at 05:34 AM
2 minute read
Addleshaw Goddard's profit per equity partner fell to £511,000 in 2016-17 – a 25% drop on the £682,000 recorded the previous year.
Top of equity at the UK firm plummeted from a record high of £1.122m last year, to £776,000 – a drop of 31%.
Partners at the bottom of the lockstep will receive £277,000, down from £295,000 in 2015-16 – a 6.5% fall. Net profit fell to £46.9m.
The fall in PEP came against a 5.8% increase in equity partner numbers, which climbed from an average of 86.7 in 2015-16 to 91.7.
Addleshaws' 2015-16 financial results were boosted by fees paid for mandates from previous years. The firm is understood to have gained more than £10m in fees paid out from the estate of oligarch Boris Berezovsky, who the firm acted for on more than 30 cases, most famously a $6bn (£3.8bn) battle with Chelsea FC owner Roman Abramovich, which Berezovsky lost in September 2012.
A spokesperson for the firm said: "In 2015-16 we explained that our results included a large, one-off gain in relation to work undertaken in prior years and that will obviously distort comparisons with the last 12 months. On an underlying basis we saw our value per point increase, which our partners will see the benefit of and we are very pleased with the results we achieved."
Confirmation of Addleshaws' profit figures comes after the firm announced on Monday that revenue had fallen by 2% when compared with last year's uplifted figure, with fee income dipping from £201.8m to £198m. The firm said underlying revenue for the period increased.
The results mark an end to a period of positive growth for Addleshaws, which last year saw revenue climb by just under 5% against a 39% hike in profits per equity partner.
Following the close of the 2016-17 financial year, the firm achieved managing partner John Joyce's long-held desire of a Scottish merger, combining with 134-lawyer firm HBJ from 1 June.
The deal will boost the firm's revenue by around £20m in 2017-18, but did not have an impact on 2016-17 results.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250