Turning data into dollars: inside DLA Piper's client retention data analytics programme
A data-driven client retention initiative has resulted in an estimated $38m revenue boost for DLA - this article looks at how the firm did it
August 23, 2017 at 06:01 PM
6 minute read
Even the biggest firms can have trouble retaining and growing revenue from clients. That was the issue facing DLA Piper in 2014.
Out of 20 clients that the firm had placed in its key partner programme, 18 had revenue to the firm stay flat or decrease over the previous year. And in the firm's marketing department, many were at a loss why this decrease was happening, let alone how to reverse it.
The answer they found was in analytics - but not just in looking at the numbers, but rather forming a data action plan focusing on specific (and perhaps unexpected) metrics that the firm found influenced retention rates more than others.
The marketing team, alongside analytics partner Axiom Consulting Partners, revealed the results of this endeavour to a standing-room-only crowd at the 'Harnessing predictive analytics to drive client growth and retention; session at the International Legal Technology Association Conference (ILTACON) in Las Vegas on 14 August.
The idea for the project came from a Time magazine article read by Kim Rennick, director of sector marketing at DLA Piper. The article explained new and interesting ways big data was being used on college campuses, such as utilising influential metrics to identify students most at risk of dropping out, then giving them extra care and tutoring. Rennick saw numerous applications to the law: "You could say that's client service for the student," she explained to the conference crowd.
However, firm leadership was not yet on board. Rennick explained that they were "not as excited as we might have wanted" at the proposal from DLA Piper chief marketing officer Barbara Taylor, but allowed the marketing team to take the project on.
Building the model
To actually launch the project, DLA Piper undertook a four-step process. The first key step, said David Kuhlman, partner at Axiom Consulting Partners who helped spearhead the initiative for the firm, was to establish the foundation of what the data was looking to solve.
"It's not important to set up a question at the beginning. You just have to know the direction you're going," Kuhlman said.
For DLA Piper, that meant finding out more about client retention. Heather Reid, director of practice marketing at DLA Piper, explained that this meant the firm would "single out what we did differently with clients that grew versus clients that shrunk."
Secondly, the team actually had to build a data model, which Kuhlman described as "70% of the work." In this case, that meant combing through four years of data and about seven million records to find the insights the firm wanted.
Thirdly, those analysing the data needed to examine the relationships between variables and see what made sense. This is because some variables that seem statistically significant can actually have nothing to do with what you want to find out (such as geographic location of clients) or can draw distracting and incorrect conclusions.
Finally, the team would build the predictive model with the variables it deemed worthwhile. Here, Kuhlman had two pieces of advice. The first was to find "the biggest impact on the least number of things in the least number of places" - in other words, reducing the number of variables so you actually have something actionable to take to firm leadership.
His other piece of advice was to pick a model that works well, but perhaps not best - it's more important to have something that's easy to explain and adoptable. "Unless people take action on the result, it's all useless."
The DLA Piper results
Ultimately, the firm settled on four key variables that its data model found directly affected client retention:
- Reducing the size of matter teams to five or less and increasing time per team member proportionally where possible;
- Introducing one new professional to the relationship;
- Adding one more industry expert to the team (which could coincide with point two); and
- Running a focused, relevant marketing initiative for each client.
Using the model, Axiom helped DLA Piper identify 1,200 at-risk clients that could be a target for the strategy, which the firm then pruned by considering the partners involved with the client, client size, and industry.
Now, DLA Piper had its list, but it still needed lawyer buy-in. The marketing team learned through analysing past data that focusing on these variables could see a 75%-80% retention increase, but actually convincing partners required a lot of legwork.
"This was the signature project of the three of us here [from DLA Piper on the panel]," Taylor explained. We understood how cool it was… and were available at a moment's notice to give advice when needed."
The team also set up a teleconference every other week with partner attorneys to monitor progress and talk about how the variables were being carried out. As Taylor said, "The team got the sense that this wasn't one and done. We kept at it, hammering away."
That hammering occurred through successes and failures. The DLA Piper members of the panel all said they were forced to be more flexible than they originally had anticipated, even kicking members of the project team off if they weren't being accountable. Rennick also adjusted her sales strategy to partners partway through, going from talking about "at-risk" clients to clients "primed to grow."
In DLA Piper's case, the project turned out to be a massive success. When comparing a control group to a group focused on improving those key variables, DLA Piper was able to prevent 85% of fee loss on a year-over-year basis. The actions started to take effect within about six months, and the team found that the more variables that were acted upon, the better retention would be.
That translated into hard dollars for DLA Piper: The firm estimates an increase in revenue of $37.6m for the firm, given the high-leverage clients involved in the process. That means that not only was this project a massive success, but it's likely to be expanded in the future - Taylor explained that the firm is now updating its client and internal partner lists and securing increased capacity for the project.
- Legal Week Connect, which will take place this November, will focus on some of the fresh ideas shaking up the business of law – click here for more information.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternational Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Appropriate Exemption in Students for Fair Admissions v. President & Fellows of Harvard College
- 2DOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
- 3New Partners at Cummings & Lockwood, Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey
- 4'Extra Government'?: NY Top Court Eyes Ethics Commission's Constitutionality
- 5South Texas College of Law Houston Selects New Dean
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250