Turning data into dollars: inside DLA Piper's client retention data analytics programme
A data-driven client retention initiative has resulted in an estimated $38m revenue boost for DLA - this article looks at how the firm did it
August 23, 2017 at 06:01 PM
6 minute read
Even the biggest firms can have trouble retaining and growing revenue from clients. That was the issue facing DLA Piper in 2014.
Out of 20 clients that the firm had placed in its key partner programme, 18 had revenue to the firm stay flat or decrease over the previous year. And in the firm's marketing department, many were at a loss why this decrease was happening, let alone how to reverse it.
The answer they found was in analytics - but not just in looking at the numbers, but rather forming a data action plan focusing on specific (and perhaps unexpected) metrics that the firm found influenced retention rates more than others.
The marketing team, alongside analytics partner Axiom Consulting Partners, revealed the results of this endeavour to a standing-room-only crowd at the 'Harnessing predictive analytics to drive client growth and retention; session at the International Legal Technology Association Conference (ILTACON) in Las Vegas on 14 August.
The idea for the project came from a Time magazine article read by Kim Rennick, director of sector marketing at DLA Piper. The article explained new and interesting ways big data was being used on college campuses, such as utilising influential metrics to identify students most at risk of dropping out, then giving them extra care and tutoring. Rennick saw numerous applications to the law: "You could say that's client service for the student," she explained to the conference crowd.
However, firm leadership was not yet on board. Rennick explained that they were "not as excited as we might have wanted" at the proposal from DLA Piper chief marketing officer Barbara Taylor, but allowed the marketing team to take the project on.
Building the model
To actually launch the project, DLA Piper undertook a four-step process. The first key step, said David Kuhlman, partner at Axiom Consulting Partners who helped spearhead the initiative for the firm, was to establish the foundation of what the data was looking to solve.
"It's not important to set up a question at the beginning. You just have to know the direction you're going," Kuhlman said.
For DLA Piper, that meant finding out more about client retention. Heather Reid, director of practice marketing at DLA Piper, explained that this meant the firm would "single out what we did differently with clients that grew versus clients that shrunk."
Secondly, the team actually had to build a data model, which Kuhlman described as "70% of the work." In this case, that meant combing through four years of data and about seven million records to find the insights the firm wanted.
Thirdly, those analysing the data needed to examine the relationships between variables and see what made sense. This is because some variables that seem statistically significant can actually have nothing to do with what you want to find out (such as geographic location of clients) or can draw distracting and incorrect conclusions.
Finally, the team would build the predictive model with the variables it deemed worthwhile. Here, Kuhlman had two pieces of advice. The first was to find "the biggest impact on the least number of things in the least number of places" - in other words, reducing the number of variables so you actually have something actionable to take to firm leadership.
His other piece of advice was to pick a model that works well, but perhaps not best - it's more important to have something that's easy to explain and adoptable. "Unless people take action on the result, it's all useless."
The DLA Piper results
Ultimately, the firm settled on four key variables that its data model found directly affected client retention:
- Reducing the size of matter teams to five or less and increasing time per team member proportionally where possible;
- Introducing one new professional to the relationship;
- Adding one more industry expert to the team (which could coincide with point two); and
- Running a focused, relevant marketing initiative for each client.
Using the model, Axiom helped DLA Piper identify 1,200 at-risk clients that could be a target for the strategy, which the firm then pruned by considering the partners involved with the client, client size, and industry.
Now, DLA Piper had its list, but it still needed lawyer buy-in. The marketing team learned through analysing past data that focusing on these variables could see a 75%-80% retention increase, but actually convincing partners required a lot of legwork.
"This was the signature project of the three of us here [from DLA Piper on the panel]," Taylor explained. We understood how cool it was… and were available at a moment's notice to give advice when needed."
The team also set up a teleconference every other week with partner attorneys to monitor progress and talk about how the variables were being carried out. As Taylor said, "The team got the sense that this wasn't one and done. We kept at it, hammering away."
That hammering occurred through successes and failures. The DLA Piper members of the panel all said they were forced to be more flexible than they originally had anticipated, even kicking members of the project team off if they weren't being accountable. Rennick also adjusted her sales strategy to partners partway through, going from talking about "at-risk" clients to clients "primed to grow."
In DLA Piper's case, the project turned out to be a massive success. When comparing a control group to a group focused on improving those key variables, DLA Piper was able to prevent 85% of fee loss on a year-over-year basis. The actions started to take effect within about six months, and the team found that the more variables that were acted upon, the better retention would be.
That translated into hard dollars for DLA Piper: The firm estimates an increase in revenue of $37.6m for the firm, given the high-leverage clients involved in the process. That means that not only was this project a massive success, but it's likely to be expanded in the future - Taylor explained that the firm is now updating its client and internal partner lists and securing increased capacity for the project.
- Legal Week Connect, which will take place this November, will focus on some of the fresh ideas shaking up the business of law – click here for more information.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause
4 minute readWhat Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform
Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1CFPB Labor Union Files Twin Lawsuits Seeking to Prevent Agency's Closure
- 2Crypto Crime Down, Hacks Up: Lawyers Warned of 2025 Security Shake-Up
- 3Atlanta Calling: National Law Firms Flock to a ‘Hotbed for Talented Lawyers’
- 4Privacy Suit Targets Education Department Over Disclosure of Student Financial Data to DOGE
- 5Colwell Law Group Founder Has Died in Skiing Accident
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250