General counsel call on law firms to share the benefits of new artificial intelligence technology
Law firms should be more collaborative in their use of technology, according to a new report on what clients really think about AI
September 20, 2017 at 05:11 AM
3 minute read
Law firms should do more to share the benefits of artificial intelligence technology with their clients, according to a new report revealing what GCs really think about AI.
The report, AI: The new wave of legal services, produced by Legal Week Intelligence and Bird & Bird, is based on 15 interviews with senior in-house lawyers, covering subjects including their current and potential use of technology, the opportunities and challenges presented by AI, and how it will shape their expectations of the law firms they instruct.
The report reveals that many GCs would like a more proactive stance from law firms in sharing the potential benefits of AI – through testing to implementation and cost savings.
KPMG general counsel Jeremy Barton argues that AI should be a catalyst for law firms and GCs to work more closely together: "What is going to change is the nature of collaboration with law firms. We pay law firms too much for doing basic research.
Technology is a big add you can bring to the table if your general counsel and their team are interested
"You could easily envisage getting to a stage where the only law firms you really want to deal with, as in-house counsel or general counsel, are those who share a platform with you, or are prepared to use your platform so that your collaboration is supported by technology that is common between you and the law firm."
Claire Debney, director of legal strategy at FTSE 100 pharma company Shire, agrees. "Law firms should be more collaborative in their use of technology," she says. "When they look at the client relationship, you have your relationship partner and your regular review. Technology is a big add you can bring to the table if your general counsel and their team are interested. Not everyone will be, but how do we know if we are going to be interested, when we're not given the chance to know that it exists?"
Other heads of legal interviewed for the report include Royal Mail group GC Maaike de Bie, BT GC Chris Fowler, National Grid GC and global head of operations Mohammed Zain Ajaz, and Vodafone Global Enterprise legal director Kerry Phillip (pictured), who says that many law firms now using AI have begun to offer such services to their clients.
As Mick Sheehy, general counsel of finance, technology, innovation and strategy at Australian telecoms giant Telstra, says: "There's a great opportunity for us to collaborate as we train machines to read basic legal agreements. That makes a lot of economic sense rather than an individual legal department doing this journey by themselves."
Other subjects covered include the challenge of justifying investment in new IT, the use of self-service tools such as 'lawbots', and the companies at the forefront of tech innovation.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-Spies Reveal How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
5 minute readUN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Is Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
German Court Finds Facebook Must Pay Users for Data Breach, But Less Than Expected
Trending Stories
- 1Depo-Provera MDL Could Be Headed to California
- 2Judge Holds New York City in Contempt Over Conditions at City Jails
- 3FTC Lauds Withdrawal of Proposed Indiana Hospitals Merger After Leaning on State Regulators
- 4Ignore the Decline in US Rule of Law at Your Peril
- 5How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250