PwC makes push into US legal market with launch of Washington DC firm
Team of lawyers set to relocate from London to launch new operation in US capital
September 21, 2017 at 04:22 AM
5 minute read
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) is set to launch a law firm in the US, in a clear sign that the concerted push into legal services by the Big Four accounting firms is continuing.
The firm, called ILC Legal, will begin operating later this month with an office in Washington DC. It will not offer US law advice, but instead will assist US clients on international issues and act as a marketing operation to generate work that can be referred to PwC's existing legal services network.
The office will be led by the head of PwC Legal's international business reorganisations practice, Richard Edmundson, who will relocate from London alongside a small number of other PwC lawyers and support staff.
"This is market-driven," said Edmundson, who has been a partner at PwC Legal since 1998. "Our clients are increasingly looking for advisers that can provide international coverage on transactions from planning to execution."
Edmundson said the office will focus on services that are relevant to US-based multinationals doing business abroad, including international corporate structuring, M&A support, labour, financial services, immigration, cybersecurity and data protection, corporate secretarial, tax controversy and dispute resolution.
"We don't regard ourselves as a traditional law firm," he said. "We don't look at legal services in isolation – it's just one part of a broader offering."
Large corporations are now "much more accepting" of accounting firms providing multidisciplinary services, including legal advice, he added.
Edmundson said PwC decided to open in Washington in part because it is a large and important market. But it also chose the city because bar rules permit lawyers to register as foreign legal consultants and practise English law.
The firm has no current plans to open additional offices in the US, but Edmundson didn't rule out it doing so in future. "We want to be successful and grow our business," he said. "We will see how the market reacts."
ILC Legal, which Edmundson described as a law firm, will be structured as a separate legal entity from the rest of PwC and its legal services arm. Edmundson said that although the firm would not offer US law advice, there is no reason why it couldn't. "It isn't controlled by the accounting firm, so it can in theory do anything that any independent law firm can do," he said.
The American Lawyer first discovered PwC's plans to launch in the US after PwC in-house IP counsel Joseph Cilluffo filed multiple trademark registrations for ILC Legal. The registrations cover the "provision of law firm and legal services related to the laws and regulations of non-US jurisdictions".
PwC then updated the legal entity listing page of its website to include ILC, while Edmundson's listing on online legal services marketplace Avvo was changed to that of a Washington legal consultant at the firm.
A recent study by ALM Intelligence warned that law firms should prepare for a "significant increase in competition" as the Big Four accounting firms continue to ramp up their legal services offerings. The report, Elephants in the Room Part I: The Big Four's Expansion in the Legal Services Market, says that the Big Four's formidable brand strength, client base and ability to offer multidisciplinary services has helped them take market share from traditional law firms.
The American Lawyer also analysed the Big Four's legal services ambitions in a 2014 feature story.
Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PwC have invested heavily in their legal services arms in recent years – particularly in Europe – and now collectively employ about 8,500 lawyers globally.
PwC Legal, the largest legal arm of the Big Four, has 2,500 lawyers, making it the world's sixth-largest legal services provider by that measure, up there with the likes of Clifford Chance and Jones Day. PwC Legal, which last year fully integrated with the accounting firm's UK business, also has offices in 85 countries, far more than any other law firm.
Each of the Big Four's legal arms has regularly achieved double-digit revenue growth – EY's revenue has risen by more than 10% for five consecutive years. But their focus on lower-value work is reflected in relatively weaker financial performance compared to top law firms. PwC Legal's $500m (£370m) revenue would put it in the bottom quartile of the Global 100 by that metric.
While the Big Four have historically focused on practices that complement their audit and tax advisory businesses, such as tax, labour and employment, and immigration, the report found that they are increasingly branching out into other areas, including M&A.
Two thirds of law firms surveyed by ALM Intelligence said they were "concerned" about the threat posed by accounting firms and other alternative service providers, while 45% consider them to be a "major threat".
ALM Intelligence will release a second report on 27 September, assessing the Big Four's prospects in the legal industry and examining three possible scenarios for their further expansion.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Thrive in Central and Eastern Europe, Law Firms Need to 'Know the Rules of the Game'
7 minute readWhat About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
The EU Top 30, 2024: Ranking the Largest Law Firms in the European Union by Headcount
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250