UK Top 50 2016-17: Eversheds Sutherland's Lee Ranson on long-sought mergers and tech priorities
Eversheds Sutherland co-CEO Lee Ranson discusses the firm's February transatlantic merger, investment priorities and the firm's performance last year
September 21, 2017 at 06:27 AM
4 minute read
For this year's UK Top 50, Legal Week has spoken to law firm leaders across the market for their take on the key trends from 2016-17, as well as their plans for the year ahead. In this Q&A, Eversheds Sutherland co-CEO Lee Ranson discusses the firm's long-sought transatlantic merger and the growing importance of technology.
What was 2016-17 like for Eversheds? "The performance of the business was good, we had 8% growth and we achieved the US tie up that we had looked at for a long time – that was a seminal moment for the firm."
How is the current year going? "Activity remains strong but, being completely open, there is a feeling that the macro conditions could bite – Brexit remains the big unknown, and how that plays out is uncertain."
What are the investment priorities for Eversheds Sutherland? "We continue to see opportunities for growth, the challenges are which ones we take. We haven't got unlimited funds to invest so it's important that we make the right decisions. One thing that is growing and looming in importance is how law firms use technology. How they invest in tech and what difference it makes to how legal services are provided – it's still playing out, but it's accelerating."
How much impact did exchange rate changes have on your results last year? "Currency fluctuations are put forward as the reason some firms had a good year, but the reality is that those firms had a good year because they are making money in their international operations - and that is the result of a strategic decision to have an international business."
Which firms do you think are best placed in today's market? "There has been some rhetoric around globalisation going backwards, but I am not sure we are really seeing that, and the results don't back that up. Businesses servicing clients in numerous jurisdictions, including traditional areas and the newer markets, are tending to fare better.
"Those organisations that have good, strong international businesses are faring well, but the profession is benefiting from an influx of inbound investment, notwithstanding Brexit. The revaluation has meant people still see the UK market as one that can provide value; and not just in other industries, but also in the law – we're seeing US law firms investing more in the legal sector here, which is both a threat and an opportunity."
You've finally found your US merger partner after a long hunt - do you think others will follow? "The sector will continue to consolidate – part of that is driven by the economies of scale that come from mergers, and part of it comes from the fast-forwarding of strategies to grow business in other markets. Part of it also comes from creating organisations with the economic wherewithal to make investments in things like technology that will set them apart. There is little doubt that trend will continue."
What impact are geopolitical and macroeconomic factors having on the firm's performance? "The macroeconomic climate is difficult generally. I don't think anyone can say it is detrimental to Western Europe but not America or Asia though, because there are issues in virtually every area of the world. You just need to carefully manage your exposure."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow to Build an Arbitration Practice: An Interview with 37-Year HSF Veteran Paula Hodges
Scratching the Entrepreneurial Itch: Linklaters' AI Head On Becoming a Partner and GenAI Hallucinations
'Relationships are Everything': Clifford Chance's Melissa Fogarty Talks Getting on Big Deals and Rising to the Top
7 minute readThe 'Returnity' Crisis: Is the Legal Profession Failing Women Lawyers Returning From Maternity Leave?
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250