UK Top 50 2016-17: Pinsent Masons' Foley on mergers, Brexit and lessons learned from KWM
The firm's senior partner on the effect of sterling weakness, UK politics and the demise of King & Wood Mallesons
September 25, 2017 at 05:43 AM
5 minute read
For this year's UK Top 50, Legal Week has spoken to law firm leaders across the market for their take on the key trends from 2016-17, as well as their plans for the year ahead. In this Q&A, Pinsent Masons senior partner Richard Foley discusses the impact of currency on the firm's performance and upcoming challenges for 2017-18
How was your year last year? "We have had a strong year, 11% growth, which puts us in the front of the pack. We are in a good space having also invested heavily in the UK in the last two or three years. We have also invested significantly overseas, opening seven offices in the last two years or so, with openings last year in Johannesburg and Madrid. You want to see those come good and they have all made good, fast starts. Australia in particular has really gone well.
"It is still a difficult market so most of the big firms will be pleased with how they have done. Brexit definitely had an immediate impact but things picked up better than most of us thought."
Has currency inflation affected your results? "Obviously you have got foreign exchange movements and if you strip that out we still had 7% growth, which puts us right at the front of the pack in terms of our peers.
"In terms of foreign exchange rates, it was neutral from a profitability perspective; the weakening pound enhanced the revenue number but your cost base goes up if you are UK-denominated. It didn't artificially inflate the profit number so we were happy with that."
Do you think more firms will merge? "It is very early days for the CMS tie-up, one will have to wait a couple of years to see how that plays out. I think there will be more consolidation, it is quite a packed table. It will be interesting because when you look at the UK top 50 there are quite a lot of firms bunching around the £100m-£200m mark. I don't know if any one of them is going to do anything but it is interesting that Olswang and Nabarro were in that space and sought to do something to move out of it.
"KWM makes you realise you have to get this stuff right, you need to be in the right shape to do a merger and you have to get the merger right. That may cause one or two to pause and think."
What keeps you up at night? "The thing that keeps me awake at the moment is the creeping inflation in the economy. I don't think we have yet seen the impact of that. You start creeping up to two, three, four percent inflation and that creates very significant pressure. It will be interesting to see how that all plays out. Of all the macro trends, the underlying rate of inflation is one I pay most attention to."
Why do you think so many firms are cutting back partner and lawyer numbers? "Our equity partner numbers have gone up; our increase in profit per equity partner (PEP) has been nothing to do with shrinking the partnership – the opposite has been the case. I know other firms have taken steps over the last couple of years to drive partner numbers down, but we are a partnership that is growing and will continue to grow."
What are the prospects for 2017-18? "We have made a good start with a strong first quarter. Our momentum from last year has continued through the summer months. We are very happy with the way we have started the year but a lot does depend on what is coming out from the government in terms of Brexit. Like many of our competitors, the UK is a major market for us. If businesses start to pause, hold back and slow down their investment decisions while waiting to see what will happen, it is inevitable that that will have an impact.
"The key thing is: there will always be lots of work, you just have to be better than the competition in terms of winning it. Whether the market is good or bad, you have to be innovative in the way you deliver legal services, stay close to your clients and be sure they will choose you over the competition."
For more, see:
- A&O managing partner Andrew Ballheimer on why clients are 'crying out' for truly global firms
- Linklaters managing partner Gideon Moore on mergers, clients, Trump and Brexit
- 'We were unlucky, but we learned a lot' – DLA Piper's Levine on that cyber attack, Brexit and office closures
- Eversheds Sutherland's Lee Ranson on long-sought mergers and tech priorities
- Clydes CEO Peter Hasson on global expansion, partner cuts and mergers
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow to Build an Arbitration Practice: An Interview with 37-Year HSF Veteran Paula Hodges
Scratching the Entrepreneurial Itch: Linklaters' AI Head On Becoming a Partner and GenAI Hallucinations
'Relationships are Everything': Clifford Chance's Melissa Fogarty Talks Getting on Big Deals and Rising to the Top
7 minute readThe 'Returnity' Crisis: Is the Legal Profession Failing Women Lawyers Returning From Maternity Leave?
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250