How law firms can counter the growing Big Four threat
As the Big Four accountants continue their march into law, how should firms prepare themselves?
September 27, 2017 at 06:59 AM
5 minute read
As PwC prepare
The report, by ALM Intelligence, says that law firms should "prepare for a significant increase in competition" – particularly if the Big Four start targeting more higher-value work. And they will need to look at changing their staffing models to help reduce costs, the report states.
Law firms should also consider forming managed legal services partnerships with the Big Four, the report adds. Allen & Overy last year teamed up with Deloitte to launch a technology product that helps banks deal with complex new derivatives regulations.
Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PwC have invested heavily in legal services in recent years – particularly in Europe – and now collectively employ about 8,500 lawyers globally.
Each of the Big Four's legal arms has regularly achieved double-digit revenue growth – EY's revenue has risen by more than 10% for five consecutive years. Their focus on lower-value work is reflected in relatively weaker financial performance compared to top law firms, however. PwC Legal's $500m revenue would put it in the bottom quartile of the Global 100 by that metric.
A separate report by ALM Intelligence, which was published earlier this month, says that the Big Four's formidable brand strength, client base and ability to offer multidisciplinary services has helped them take market share from traditional law firms.
While the Big Four have historically focused on practices that complement their audit and tax advisory businesses, such as tax, labour and employment, and immigration, they are increasingly branching out into other areas, including M&A.
Two thirds of law firms surveyed by ALM Intelligence said they were "concerned" about the threat posed by accounting firms and other alternative service providers, while 45% consider them to be a "major threat".
The latest report comes less than a week after The American Lawyer reported that PwC will be launching a law firm in the US.
The business, called ILC Legal, will operate out of Washington DC. It will not offer US law advice, but instead will assist US clients on international issues and act as a marketing operation to generate work that can be referred to PwC's existing legal services network.
ILC will be led by the head of PwC Legal's international business reorganisations practice, Richard Edmundson, who will relocate from London alongside a small number of other PwC lawyers and support staff.
Edmundson said the office will focus on services that are relevant to US-based multinationals doing business abroad, including international corporate structuring, M&A support, labour, financial services, immigration, cybersecurity and data protection, corporate secretarial, tax controversy and dispute resolution. "We don't regard ourselves as a traditional law firm," he said. "We don't look at legal services in isolation – it's just one part of a broader offering."
ILC, which Edmundson described as a "law firm", is structured as a separate legal entity from the rest of PwC and its legal services arm. Edmundson said that although the firm would not offer US law advice, there is no reason why it couldn't. "It isn't controlled by the accounting firm, so it can in theory do anything that any independent law firm can do," he said.
Large corporations are now "much more accepting" of accounting firms providing multidisciplinary services, including legal advice, he added.
Edmundson said PwC decided to open in Washington DC, in part because it is a large and important market. But it also chose the city because bar rules permit lawyers to register as foreign legal consultants and practice UK law.
The firm has no current plans to open additional offices in the US, but Edmundson didn't rule out it doing so in future. "We want to be successful and grow our business," he said. "We will see how the market reacts."
With 3,200 lawyers across 90 countries, PwC's legal arm is not only the largest of the Big Four, it is the world's sixth-largest legal services provider by lawyer headcount – ahead of Hogan Lovells, Jones Day and Clifford Chance.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Authenticating Electronic Signatures
- 2'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 3Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 4A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 5Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250