CMS overhauls UK parental leave policy to let lawyers and staff stay home for longer
Firm scraps claw back provision for non-returners as it bids to encourage women to come back after longer periods of maternity leave
September 29, 2017 at 04:17 AM
3 minute read
CMS has overhauled its parental leave package for UK staff and lawyers, potentially allowing new parents to stay at home with their child for several years before returning to the firm, rather than the standard 12-months.
The overhaul, which follows a move to more than double the paid maternity leave on offer to 26 weeks on full pay, unifies the different systems previously in place across legacy firms Nabarro, Olswang and CMS, which merged on 1 May this year.
It means new parents will be able to apply to take off longer than 12 months to raise their children, without harming their career prospects, with the extended leave on offer for same-sex and adoptive primary carers as well as new mothers.
The newly merged firm has also scrapped a 'claw back' provision that meant that those opting not to return to work after 12 months' leave had to repay some of their maternity pay to the firm.
CMS UK chair and senior partner Penelope Warne told Legal Week: "Most businesses and most law firms require people returning to work to come back after 12 months, and if you don't, your job can't be guaranteed. We have changed that bit. Although you're not being paid there's flexibility about welcoming you back after 15 months, 18 months or two years."
Warne stressed that there is no time limit to the extended period of unpaid leave. "Even at the extremes, even if you take the more extended period, we value our alumni and we would try to accommodate people."
She said that women will not damage their career prospects by applying for a longer period of maternity leave, and added that the new system applies equally to all new parents.
"If women take maternity leave it should not impact their career progression. I know from my experience at the firm that we have promoted female partners when they have been pregnant or early returners.
"There's no maximum time limit. What we are saying is we want to support our women in the business and I think that's a very important thing. We are very supportive of paternity leave as well. Whether male, female, straight, gay, your own child or adopted – all equally benefit."
Those taking parental leave will receive 26 weeks on full pay, followed by 13 weeks of statutory maternity leave. Until May this year the firm previously paid 10 weeks in full with 16 weeks on half pay, followed by 13 weeks' statutory maternity pay.
Earlier this month, US firm Morrison & Foerster (MoFo) also changed its maternity and paternity leave packages for employees and lawyers - with the exception of partners – in its London office.
Previously, the firm offered 13 weeks' maternity leave at full pay and 13 weeks at half pay. It has doubled its full-pay offering to 26 weeks, with statutory pay for the remaining 13 weeks of leave.
Meanwhile, it has extended paternity leave from two weeks at full pay to six weeks. The firm does not have clawback provisions in London for maternity and paternity packages.
A press spokesperson said the US firm would be "flexible" and "open to a conversation" with an employee who wanted to return to work at MoFo after 12 months.
The firm is currently reviewing its parental leave policy, with a view to paying more than the statutory minimum.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNorton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over 'Unreasonable' Ethnicity Score System
3 minute read'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250