Hunton & Williams and Andrews Kurth explore merger
Hunton sizes up combination with fellow US firm after merger talks with Addleshaws go cold
October 04, 2017 at 05:52 PM
2 minute read
Hunton & Williams and Andrews Kurth Kenyon are in merger talks, two sources have told the New York Law Journal.
While it is not clear how far the talks have progressed, a merger vote is not imminently expected, the sources said.
Hunton has in recent years held talks with Addleshaw Goddard over a tie-up, while Andrews Kurth has also been on the prowl for a combination, even after acquiring intellectual property boutique Kenyon & Kenyon last year.
Andrews Kurth, which has nearly 400 lawyers, has also spoken with other law firms, but the talks with 660-lawyer Hunton appear to be more serious, sources said.
Both US firms have offices in London. Hunton has about 20 lawyers in the City, including seven partners, according to its website. The firm significantly downsized in London about six years ago, when a number of corporate partners left, leaving the office to focus primarily on data protection and banking and finance.
Andrews Kurth, meanwhile, has a five-partner London base led by arbitration partner Melanie Willems, who joined from Chadbourne & Parke in 2013.
Some of Hunton and Andrews Kurth's key financial metrics are similar. Profits per equity partner are $1.26m at Andrews Kurth and $1.1m at Hunton, while revenue per lawyer is $820,000 at Hunton and $885,000 at Andrews Kurth.
Revenue at Hunton, which placed 63rd in the most recent Am Law 100 rankings, rose 2.5% to $541m in 2016, while the 111th-ranked Andrews Kurth saw turnover fall 2.7% to $289m.
Both firms have been hit by a series of partner defections this year. In June, a team of Hunton competition lawyers, including five partners, left to join Shearman & Sterling in Washington DC.
Andrews Kurth spokeswoman Ashley Nelly said the firm's managing partner, Bob Jewell, was not available to comment, while Buck declined to comment about his plans. Hunton spokeswoman Eleanor Kerlow said the firm had no comment.
Addleshaws' merger discussions with Hunton, which began in 2015, are now thought to be very unlikely to come to fruition, with one former Addleshaws partner describing the talks as "very, very cold now".
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic about M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readCracking Canada: How International Law Firms Penetrate the Country's Legal Market
6 minute readDeal Watch: Davis Polk, Wachtell Work Multiple Big Deals as Election Economics Become Focus for Dealmakers
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250