Clydes signs lease on expanded Manchester office following 70% increase in turnover
Firm's 450 Manchester staff to move to the new office over the next year
October 06, 2017 at 05:02 AM
2 minute read
Clyde & Co has signed a lease for 69,000 sq ft in Manchester's Royal Exchange building following rapid revenue growth.
Revenues from the office have increased by almost 70% over five years, rising from £19m in 2012/13 to £32m in 2016/17. This year the office is projected to generate £35m to £40m in turnover.
The firm already occupies 11,000 sq ft in the grade II listed building, in addition to 40,000 sq ft at Chancery Place, but plans to move its entire 450-strong Manchester team under one roof over a 12-month period.
The firm currently has a headcount of 100 in the Royal Exchange Building, with about 200 lawyers and staff set to join them in mid-November and a further 150 following in the coming year.
The office is the firm's second largest in the UK and was formed through a merger with Barlow Lyde & Gilbert in 2011.
Manchester managing partner David Wynn said: "Manchester is expanding rapidly and has become the second most important legal market in the UK. Leeds may disagree, but I think that weight has shifted over to our side of the Pennines.
"The success of the insurance practice in Manchester in terms of additional client wins has driven a doubling of the practice size in four years. The second element of our expansion is the widening of the practice groups in Manchester through laterals. That has given Clydes an additional price point in terms of marine, aviation, employment and real estate work."
Despite the expansion, Wynn said there would be no mass move of services towards Manchester.
He added: "London services London clients. If London can widen its teams into Manchester and widen its provision for clients with northern outposts that is more than encouraged, but there will be no formal north-shoring of London services."
In 2016-17, the firm posted a 14% revenue hike, moving above £500m for the first time. In the firm's 19th successive year of growth, it took in £508.1m, however profit per equity partner fell by 2% to £650,000.
Photo credit: David Dixon
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readSingapore Oil Tycoon Appeals 17.5 Year Prison Sentence In Fraudulent Trading Case
Charles Russell Speechlys Opens in Milan to Focus on Ultra-High Net Worth Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Judiciary Law §487 in 2024
- 2Polsinelli's Revenue and Profits Surge Amid Partner De-Equitizations, Retirements
- 3Environmental Fines: Texas Secures Over $100M From Petrochemical Processor TPC Group
- 4US Law Firm Leasing Up Nearly 30% Through Q3, With a Growing Number of Firms Staying in Place
- 5SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250