UK Top 50 2016-17: the firms battling to make their mark at the edge of the rankings
Whether by merger or organic growth, the firms just outside the top 50 face intense competition for a place in the top tier of the UK market
October 12, 2017 at 03:59 AM
5 minute read
For the firms at the bottom of the UK top 50 table, the competition is intense. Revenues are tightly grouped, and in any given year a firm can leapfrog the competition to make its way into the rankings – the most common method being a merger.
Blake Morgan, itself the product of the 2014 combination of Blake Lapthorn and Morgan Cole, this year sits in 50th place with revenue of £74.5m. Just £5m covers the next three firms – Freeths (£72m), Shakespeare Martineau (£71.5m) and Pennington Manches (£69.6m) – highlighting an opportunity for all of them to push into the top 50 next year.
The 2015 merger of Shakespeares and SGH Martineau propelled Shakespeare Martineau into the rankings last year, but a relatively flat 2016-17, during which revenue crept up by less than 1% from £71m to £71.5m, put paid to the firm's place in the top 50.
CEO Andy Raynor (pictured above) says: "I view us as a top 50 firm in quality, and the desire is to grow the business. One of the reasons we have grown so rapidly in recent years is through mergers. We feel that they have been very successful, but I think we need to keep our feet on the ground locally – there is a real demand from to clients to know they have local advisers who understand the local climate and take them wherever they need to go, nationally and further.
"Yes, we would like to grow to be a larger national business, and we would continue on the merger trail, but it must not be to the detriment of what we want to do organically."
Another firm that has flitted around the edges of the UK top 50 in recent years is Browne Jacobson, which placed 50th in 2014-15. The firm had been set for a return to the rankings this year amid merger talks with construction and insurance practice Beale & Company, which would have created a combined £82m firm. However, the discussions came to an end this summer, and while Browne Jacobson still boosted revenues by 4% to £66.8m, it too narrowly missed out on this year's top 50.
Managing partner Iain Blatherwick (pictured) said: "We are still open minded to merging, but we would only be interested if it was a strong strategic fit and complemented our sector focus areas.
"As an ambitious firm we would like to consistently be in the UK top 50. However, over time the relative strength of the competition and increasing consolidation means the boundaries have been shifting. The option to merge will remain a part of our strategy, but it won't be because we simply want to be bigger – it has to be a good fit."
In contrast, Scotland's Burness Paull – now among the largest firms north of the border following a run of takeovers of the country's major players – is focusing on organic growth. The firm, which posted 2016-17 revenue of £53.8m, is one of three Scots firms in the 51-60 bracket, alongside Brodies (£66.7m) and Shepherd and Wedderburn (£50.5m).
The top end of the Scottish market has been transformed during the past 10 years, with former UK top 50 stalwarts Dundas & Wilson and McGrigors acquired by CMS and Pinsent Masons respectively, and Maclay Murray & Spens this year sealing a merger with Dentons, but Burness Paull chairman Philip Rodney is resolute about the benefits of independence.
Rodney (pictured right) says: "We want to remain independent. That model works for our clients and us. It works for our clients because the talent we have is focused on serving our client base in Scotland, and it works for us because we like dealing with the complex end of the transactions. In the case of a merger you inevitably become the branch office, with the sexy stuff done in London.
"One observation you might make is that the independent firms have all done very well. Look to Brodies or Shepherd and Wedderburn, and the same is true in Europe with the independent firms such as Garrigues and Noerr doing well."
The case for organic growth has been made plainly by this year's only new top 50 entrant - Stewarts Law. The litigation specialist firm shot into the rankings for the first time this year, despite the failure of merger talks with Enyo Law. The firm, which concluded a number of long-running cases last year, has more than doubled in size from a £35m firm five years ago to £78m this year, proving that merger is by no means the only route into the top 50 rankings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Thrive in Central and Eastern Europe, Law Firms Need to 'Know the Rules of the Game'
7 minute readGOP's Washington Trifecta Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
Trending Stories
- 1AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 2Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 3Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 4'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
- 5Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250