Eversheds Sutherland in line for £2m revenue boost from new litigation technology initiative
ES Locate platform set to generate £2m in revenues in first year of operation
October 18, 2017 at 07:05 AM
3 minute read
New e-disclosure technology developed by Eversheds Sutherland is on track to deliver a £2m revenue boost for the firm in its first year of operation, according to litigation head Paul Worth.
The ES Locate platform – which was developed in tandem with Canadian technology company OpenText – was launched about six months ago, and has since been utilised by the firm in more than 40 litigation cases.
The technology enables the firm's 700 disputes and investigations lawyers to review information more quickly and accurately using data analytics, predictive coding and interactive data visualisation tools.
Worth (pictured) said: "ES Locate is likely to generate additional revenue of up to £2m in the first year. Historically, we would have paid different external suppliers for the e-disclosure support we needed on a case-by-case basis. Now my team all have 24/7 access to a cutting-edge review platform and a team of our own data analysts. So we are far more self-sufficient, which allows us to offer a better service to our clients.
"The fact that we are keeping the revenue within the firm is a 'nice to have', rather than a driver for the project. It is all about improving the way we do things."
The launch of ES Locate was accompanied by the hire of litigation technology head Enzo Lisciotto, who joined from Norton Rose Fulbright earlier this year to help the firm with its efforts to modernise its disclosure and document review processes.
The firm also now has three full-time data analysts who provide support to its litigators, and as part of its arrangement with OpenText, it can also draw on the tech company's team of project managers and analysts as additional resource if required.
"The old outsourcing model was OK, but having our own platform and team with overflow capacity available on tap from OpenText is a much better solution," said Worth.
Worth added that the use of technology would help save money for clients when compared to manual document review.
"Using clever data analytics and predictive coding as part of a review will generally mean a significant cost saving for clients. Every case is different of course, but cost savings of 50% or more can be achieved when compared to traditional review methodology," he said.
Eversheds' litigation team also receives assistance from a support unit based in Cardiff, which provides document review and costs-related support for clients, while the firm also now has a similar litigation support centre in Houston following this February's merger with US merger partner Sutherland Asbill & Brennan.
"This provides a fully integrated but more flexible approach to resourcing, and ensures a lower-cost solution for appropriate workstreams during the conduct of a case. We have now added market-leading technology into the mix, and no doubt there will be a lot more of that to come," Worth said.
The legacy Eversheds business took in revenues of £438.6m during 2016-17, while Sutherland reported revenues of $305m for the last calendar year before the tie-up.
- LegalWeek Connect – a business conference for business people in law firms – is taking place on 29-30 November at The Institution of Engineering and Technology in London. Click here to find out more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
- 1The Rise of AI-Generated Deepfakes: A New Cybersecurity Threat for Law Firms
- 2Litigation Leaders: Labaton’s Eric Belfi on Running Case Investigation, Analysis and Evaluation In-House
- 3Spoliation Sanctions
- 4At FDA, Flavored Vape Products Go Up In Smoke
- 5Arguing Class Actions: CAFA’s Local Controversy Exception
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250