Eversheds Sutherland in line for £2m revenue boost from new litigation technology initiative
ES Locate platform set to generate £2m in revenues in first year of operation
October 18, 2017 at 07:05 AM
3 minute read
New e-disclosure technology developed by Eversheds Sutherland is on track to deliver a £2m revenue boost for the firm in its first year of operation, according to litigation head Paul Worth.
The ES Locate platform – which was developed in tandem with Canadian technology company OpenText – was launched about six months ago, and has since been utilised by the firm in more than 40 litigation cases.
The technology enables the firm's 700 disputes and investigations lawyers to review information more quickly and accurately using data analytics, predictive coding and interactive data visualisation tools.
Worth (pictured) said: "ES Locate is likely to generate additional revenue of up to £2m in the first year. Historically, we would have paid different external suppliers for the e-disclosure support we needed on a case-by-case basis. Now my team all have 24/7 access to a cutting-edge review platform and a team of our own data analysts. So we are far more self-sufficient, which allows us to offer a better service to our clients.
"The fact that we are keeping the revenue within the firm is a 'nice to have', rather than a driver for the project. It is all about improving the way we do things."
The launch of ES Locate was accompanied by the hire of litigation technology head Enzo Lisciotto, who joined from Norton Rose Fulbright earlier this year to help the firm with its efforts to modernise its disclosure and document review processes.
The firm also now has three full-time data analysts who provide support to its litigators, and as part of its arrangement with OpenText, it can also draw on the tech company's team of project managers and analysts as additional resource if required.
"The old outsourcing model was OK, but having our own platform and team with overflow capacity available on tap from OpenText is a much better solution," said Worth.
Worth added that the use of technology would help save money for clients when compared to manual document review.
"Using clever data analytics and predictive coding as part of a review will generally mean a significant cost saving for clients. Every case is different of course, but cost savings of 50% or more can be achieved when compared to traditional review methodology," he said.
Eversheds' litigation team also receives assistance from a support unit based in Cardiff, which provides document review and costs-related support for clients, while the firm also now has a similar litigation support centre in Houston following this February's merger with US merger partner Sutherland Asbill & Brennan.
"This provides a fully integrated but more flexible approach to resourcing, and ensures a lower-cost solution for appropriate workstreams during the conduct of a case. We have now added market-leading technology into the mix, and no doubt there will be a lot more of that to come," Worth said.
The legacy Eversheds business took in revenues of £438.6m during 2016-17, while Sutherland reported revenues of $305m for the last calendar year before the tie-up.
- LegalWeek Connect – a business conference for business people in law firms – is taking place on 29-30 November at The Institution of Engineering and Technology in London. Click here to find out more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClaus von Wobeser: Mexico's ‘Godfather of Arbitration’ Becomes Firm’s Honorary Chair
Slaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Trending Stories
- 1Day Pitney Announces Partner Elevations
- 2The New Rules of AI: Part 2—Designing and Implementing Governance Programs
- 3Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
- 4As Litigation Finance Industry Matures, Links With Insurance Tighten
- 5The Gold Standard: Remembering Judge Jeffrey Alker Meyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250