Herbert Smith Freehills' Rigotti sets out plans for European and US expansion and Asian integration
Fresh from announcing details of its Milan launch, HSF's CEO sets out the firm's expansion plans elsewhere
October 24, 2017 at 09:08 AM
4 minute read
Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) is in expansion mode. Yesterday (23 October), the firm announced plans to open in Milan with the hire of Simmons & Simmons Italy dispute resolution and intellectual property Italy head, Laura Orlando, and CEO Mark Rigotti (pictured) says more growth in continental Europe is on the way.
"Europe is a very important focus for us," he tells Legal Week. "We will keep looking for where we want to grow next, based on our clients' needs."
In the short to medium term, the Anglo-Australian firm is planning to build out its offices in Paris, Spain and Germany through hires in disputes, with Rigotti stating that the practice balance on the continent is currently weighted more heavily towards corporate work.
He flags Brexit as a driving factor for the firm's need to bolster its disputes team in Europe. "We believe Brexit will push a lot more of that litigation work into Europe. We need to plan for that and to have an appropriate offering there," he adds.
News of the Milan office launch came a month after HSF's annual partner conference, which this year was held in Hong Kong. Partners say that alongside the planned European push, the firm's Asian business was also in the spotlight.
One German partner who attended says: "The aim was to make every single partner aware of what our offering [in China and Asia] is, with a view to generating inbound and outbound work. The firm is looking at how to further grow in China – if you want to further penetrate the market you need greater size."
This aim is on its way to being realised, with HSF recently adding three projects partners in China from Pinsent Masons, including China head Hew Kian Heong.
Rigotti says: "The hires are great for us, and we'll continue to focus on growing in China over the next few years. It's certainly not the last chapter in the story – more like chapter two or three out of 10."
The trio's practice focus fits with HSF's plans to build up around the 'one belt, one road' initiative, according to Rigotti.
"It's a difficult market as the Chinese firms are immensely strong, but we're concentrating on the 'one belt, one road' initiative. We want to tap further into the infrastructure market – the level of construction in the Asia region is huge – and we're keen on the capital flows surrounding it, not just acting for the Chinese developers," he says.
To access this transactional work, HSF is encouraging its offices to operate in a more joined-up way. The firm scrapped office separate accounts for some of its Southeast Asia bases last year, and Rigotti wants all practices to operate at the same level of integration as HSF's disputes teams in the region.
He explains: "We're tilting our operating model in Asia to make it more of a single team rather than a series of offices. We see the disputes team there as executing work in the right way in terms of cross-collaboration – we'd like to see the transactional practices [operating] at the same level."
One City partner says of the plans: "Partners need to come at it from both ends – the network only works if at the other end you have partners who know and like each other. The firm can draw the boxes and lines but you need partners to plug in. It's about leveraging those individual relationships."
New York is also on HSF's agenda after the firm boosted the office with the hire of its first corporate partner in the city in September.
Corporate partner James Robinson rejoined the firm from Morrison & Foerster in Tokyo, having left HSF to join the US firm two years previously.
Rigotti says the New York office is doing a large amount of Latin America work and this will shape its future growth: "We're carefully expanding. Our Latin America work is going really well in a hyper-competitive market, so that's a great sign. Further growth in the LatAm group and arbitration practice is logical, as well as potentially in financial services disputes too."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250