'Doing nothing isn't the right answer' - new research highlights scale of risks of AI and Brexit
As Law Society predicts 5,000 legal jobs could go by 2018, new research emphasises technology and Brexit challenges
November 07, 2017 at 04:12 AM
4 minute read
Technology and talent retention have been identified as two of the main challenges facing law firms, according to research from professional services firm Smith & Williamson – findings that are backed up by new Law Society data which suggests the profession could lose up to 20% of jobs as a result of new technology.
Smith & Williamson's annual law firm survey found that more than half (51%) of law firm respondents now pinpoint the adoption of new technology as one of the biggest challenges facing them over the next two to three years.
With artificial intelligence (AI) forcing firms to look at how they structure their operations, they are becoming increasingly aware of the threat that this technology poses, as well as the opportunities. As a result, respondents ranked technology as the second biggest risk they face this year, compared with sixth biggest risk last year.
Smith & Williamson professional practices head Giles Murphy (pictured) said: "What is interesting is that a quarter of people see AI as an issue – in the past, technology challenges have been been focused on efficiency of service delivery, but AI is about changing the process of service delivery and people are now recognising that threat."
These concerns tally with new research from the Law Society, which predicts a gradual reduction in total employment in the legal services sector as a result of automation and AI, alongside an associated increase in productivity.
The research predicts that as many as 5,000 jobs could go in England and Wales by 2025, with as many as 20% of jobs lost by 2038.
With fee income per lawyer stagnating in recent years, Murphy urges firms to use AI and automation as an opportunity to restructure their business to drive up productivity figures in a way that has not yet happened.
He said: "You would expect with more technology that firms would all be more efficient. But analysis of firms' accounts shows people costs have been increasing at the same rate as income growth, so any gains are being passed onto clients without firms benefiting. But that is where AI really comes to the fore – it can change service delivery and cut costs for firms."
Smith & Williamson's survey of the top 200 law firms found retaining talent remains the number one issue facing respondents, with nearly three quarters (72%) of respondents placing it in the top spot.
Brexit was, unsurprisingly, also identified as a risk to firms' business by nearly two thirds of respondents but, despite this, business confidence in the short term is high – with more than 90% of respondents feeling positive about the next 12 months. In the longer term, 77% of respondents admitted to concerns about activity levels holding up.
Despite their fears about Brexit, less than a quarter of the law firm leaders and CFOs taking part in Smith & Williamson's survey said they had put in place a strategic plan to deal with the implications of Brexit.
Murphy concluded: "Given the challenges of Brexit, I'm surprised confidence is as high as it is – it is the same as in 2005-06. What is concerning is that most firms said they have not yet put in place a strategy plan to look at the full implications of Brexit. Even if they don't know what to do, doing nothing is not the right answer."
- LegalWeek Connect – a business conference for business people in law firms, featuring a big-name line-up of speakers – is taking place on 29-30 November, with technology and AI among the topics on the agenda. Click here to find out more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen Inadvertent Disclosures Happen at a Law Firm, Who Is Responsible?
Canadians Mourn the Loss of Two Esteemed Legal Professionals: Alan Young and Jason Moyse
4 minute readLawyers Should Only Use AI For Low-end Tasks, Regulators in Australia Say
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250