Freshfields sets up new group to tackle deal roadblocks as protectionism rises
Magic circle firm appoints competition partners to lead 40-strong group of lawyers around the world
November 08, 2017 at 05:34 AM
4 minute read
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has set up a new group to help clients deal with rising levels of protectionism across the world.
According to research carried out by the firm, since 2014 there has been a 30% increase in £1bn-plus transactions that Freshfields has worked on that have been impacted by foreign investment rules or public interest issues.
The firm's research also highlights that five of the G7 countries have strengthened their foreign investment or public interest regimes since 2014, while the UK, US and EU are all currently reviewing the way that they deal with such issues.
In response to these developments, the firm has established a public interest and foreign investment group to help clients facing these issues on M&A deals. The group is co-led by competition partners John Davies in London and Alastair Mordaunt in Hong Kong, and includes about 40 lawyers from the firm's competition and corporate teams around the world.
"The group needs to be global in scope to cover how these issues are increasing around the world," says Davies. "What is crucial is pulling together our existing capability and making sure that, when a particular matter needs it, we are operating as efficiently as possible.
"In order to get these deals through, you need to engage with all stakeholders and not just the relevant government, which is one reason why this group needs to go beyond what we have been doing historically.
"I led all the global regulatory work on the AB InBev-SABMiller merger, where we had 30 jurisdictions to make filings in. What is less understood is that in 15 of those we needed remedies to obtain approval. Of those, half were public interest or foreign investment situations.
"For example, we had to engage on that front in South Africa, in four or five other African countries and in a number of South American countries and Australia, which also had material foreign investment provisions."
Davies added that the firm was working to develop a "roster of advisers" around the world that they could pull together as a team to act for clients on transactions. "To a certain extent, that is what we have been doing previously, but now we are going to be doing it more systematically," he said.
According to Davies, this would include both local counsel in various jurisdictions and other advisers such as banks and public affairs consultants.
"On the South African part of the AB InBev-SABMiller merger, we had two law firms, we had public affairs advisers, investment banks, everyone working together to achieve the successful outcome," Davies said.
The launch of the group comes after the firm's hire this March of Shawn Cooley from the US Department of Homeland Security in Washington DC, where he served as director of foreign investment risk management. He has joined the magic circle firm as special counsel to advise on Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States issues, and according to Davies, the firm is likely to make more hires in this area.
Bruce Embley, who co-heads the firm's global M&A client group and who was also part of the firm's team on the AB InBev-SABMiller deal, adds that while protectionist measures are increasing around the world, there is usually a solution to get transactions over the line.
"It is quite significant when it bites, but there are ways to get through these issues, and the fact there are now more public interest issues doesn't necessarily mean the impacted deal will be blocked," he said. "There are successful examples, such as Softbank's acquisition of Arm Holdings, where there were legitimate public interest concerns that were successfully resolved.
"What is clear is when we do have one of these deals, the approaches that you need to get them to successful closing are evolving. It is one of the reasons why, although this skillset has been around for a long time, we have decided we need a dedicated group that can focus on this very fluid and rapidly changing space."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK Competition Watchdog Greenlights Google’s $2B Anthropic Investment, Lawyers Weigh in
Likely Next EU Competition Chief Keeps Cards Close to Her Chest in 3-Hour Confirmation Hearing
3 minute read'Significant' Competition Concerns Over £762M GXO Logistics-Wincanton Merger
Trending Stories
- 1Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
- 2Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
- 3Deal Watch: What Dealmakers Are Thankful for in 2024
- 4'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
- 5Attorney Sanctioned for Not Exercising Ordinary Care: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250