Locke Lord receives record SDT fine for failure to prevent former partner's 'dubious' actions
US firm hit with record £500,000 fine after admitting failure to oversee former partner
November 08, 2017 at 11:10 AM
3 minute read
Locke Lord has received a record £500,000 fine from the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT), after admitting that it failed to prevent a former London partner from using a client account for "dubious" financial arrangements.
The penalty is double the previous record SDT fine of £250,000 handed out to White & Case earlier this year for conflict and confidentiality failures.
Locke Lord admitted four failings related to its supervision of former partner Jonathan Denton – who left the firm in October 2015 – including that it had failed to prevent him from "using the firm's client account in transactions that bore the hallmarks of dubious financial arrangements or investment schemes".
The US firm also admitted it failed to have effective systems and controls in place to identify and assess potential conflicts of interest, and that it had failed to prevent Denton from directing payments in and out of the firm's client account which were "not related to an underlying legal transaction or a service forming part of the firm's normal regulated activities".
Denton has been referred to the SDT after denying the allegations levelled at him. The SRA also claims that he misled third parties by producing false invoices and knowingly made statements that he knew to be untrue. The allegations are subject to a hearing before the SDT.
Locke Lord launched in London in 2011, following the hire of a seven-partner team from Salans. Denton, who joined the firm the following year from an in-house role at private lender Berkeley House Investments, is a financial services and banking specialist, and is also a former partner at Mishcon de Reya, Salans and Wragge & Co.
A Locke Lord spokesperson said: "The matters investigated by the SRA concern the actions of Jonathan Denton and relate only to clients for whom he worked. None of the firm's other clients were affected by Denton's actions. We regret what has happened, but we are pleased to note that the SRA accepted our position that the firm and its senior officers did not act dishonestly or with conscious impropriety, or turn a blind eye to Denton's conduct.
"After Denton's departure from the firm – effective October 2015 – and in consideration of matters that came to light, steps were taken to review existing practices and procedure. A number of changes and improvements were made. We remain committed to ensuring that we are at the forefront of best practice, that we uphold the legal profession's high standards, and that this situation does not arise again."
A Solicitors Regulation Authority spokesperson added: "The firm recognises the seriousness of the issues and has worked constructively with us to ensure proper public protection."
White & Case's £250,000 fine – previously the largest ever made by the SDT against a single firm – related to a 2014 High Court case that saw the firm blocked from acting for Ukrainian client Victor Pinchuk after it failed to identify a conflict of interest.
The SDT ruled that the actions of partner David Goldberg – who was fined £50,000 and ordered to pay costs of £12,500 – had "caused harm to the reputation of the profession in an area of international business".
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTop Labor Lawyer and Former Germany Managing Partner Leaves A&O Shearman to Found Boutique Firm
3 minute readNoerr’s Former Polish Office Merges With Big Professional Services Firm Eying German-Speaking Clients
3 minute readUS-Based Smith, Gambrell & Russell Expands to Italy With Cross-Border Transactional Attorneys
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250