SDT judgment in landmark Locke Lord case reveals details of partner's 'dubious' £21m investment scheme and airport arrest
SDT judgment reveals ex-Locke Lord partner was arrested at Birmingham Airport in 2015 after questions over two-and-a-half-year investment scheme
November 13, 2017 at 08:52 AM
5 minute read
Locke Lord failed to prevent a London partner from using the firm's client account to run a "dubious" £21m investment scheme for two and a half years, despite enquiries from the FBI and the Metropolitan Police, a Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) judgment has revealed.
The judgment, published on Friday (10 November), contains full details of the background to the US firm's record £500,000 SDT fine, which it received last week after admitting a number of failings regarding its supervision of former banking and finance partner Jonathan Denton, who was arrested at Birmingham Airport in late 2015 after being fired from the firm that summer.
Denton – also a former partner at Mishcon de Reya, Salans and Wragge & Co – joined Locke Lord in March 2012, shortly after it launched a London office at the start of that year.
The judgment sets out how in July 2012, a company named Ikaya was incorporated with Denton as sole director and his wife as company secretary, along with a second company, Slonne, which "purported to operate… an investment scheme offering very high yields".
A client engagement letter was subsequently sent from the firm to Ikaya and Slonne, addressed to Denton on behalf of Ikaya, setting out a retainer and confirming that Denton would be the client partner – an issue the firm later noted as having created "a certain mixing" of his roles as Ikaya director and Locke Lord lawyer.
The judgment states that Denton and Locke Lord advised Ikaya "in relation to seven investment trusts during the retainer" between September 2012 and June 2015, during which time Denton billed a total of 1,424.9 hours, delivering invoices from the firm to Ikaya totalling £532,045, $657,194 and €286,902. Approximately £21m was paid into the firm's client account by investors during that period.
Despite Denton's efforts to assure those putting money into the scheme that their capital would be safe, and that he could achieve monthly returns of 6%, the judgment states that "there did not appear to be any verifiable returns to investors".
It adds that Denton used his status as a qualified lawyer to "promote the investment scheme to potential investors" and attempted to "lend credibility to the investment schemes" by meeting at least one potential investor at the firm's offices.
Questions began to be asked in 2013, when Locke Lord was contacted by the FBI over fears that $2m of an investor's money was at risk. The FBI was concerned that an individual involved in the transactions with "some history of prior investment fraud or irregularities" may have been trying to divert the funds for his personal use.
Later that year, the firm was contacted by the Metropolitan Police Service with regards to "the veracity" of £7m remitted from its Dallas office into the firm's client account – an enquiry which was fielded by Denton.
In 2014, after receiving more questions from investors, Locke Lord's compliance officer for legal practice (COLP) expressed concerns to the firm's general counsel that there had been "a certain mixing" of Denton's roles as a lawyer of the firm and a director of Ikaya.
After an April 2015 call from North Yorkshire Police regarding another investor complaint, Denton – who had already stepped down to an of counsel role – was fired and given three months' notice as of 23 July that year.
However, the COLP continued to forward enquiries from investors to Denton during his gardening leave, and he was permitted to continue using his firm email account.
On 10 October 2015, Denton was arrested at Birmingham Airport, five days before a telephone meeting took place between Locke Lord's COLP, general counsel, and several investors, with the intention of finding out where their money was being held. Denton was invited to attend the meeting but ignored calls, emails and text messages.
The tribunal was told that the firm has settled a number of claims with investors, but that it has been difficult to ascertain the sums involved. The firm's insurance has an excess of $2.5m, which has been paid.
Denton did not attend the tribunal and has been referred to the SDT after denying the allegations. The SRA also claims that he misled third parties by producing false invoices and knowingly made statements that he knew to be untrue. The allegations are subject to a hearing before the SDT.
Herbert Smith Freehills represented Locke Lord at the tribunal hearing, with litigation partners Tom Leech QC and David Reston leading the firm's team, while Capsticks partner Daniel Purcell acted for the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Locke Lord's £500,000 penalty is double the previous record SDT fine of £250,000 handed out to White & Case earlier this year for conflict and confidentiality failures.
While the firm admitted it failed to have effective systems and controls in place to identify and assess potential conflicts of interest, it said it had taken steps to to review existing practices and procedure and has made a number of "changes and improvements".
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGermany’s Wirecard Case Moves to Airport Hangar to Accommodate 100 Lawyers
5 minute readCan Labour's New Budget Steady the Ship? Big Moves On UK Tax Reform and Fiscal Stability
5 minute readGreenberg Takes 7-Lawyer Project- and Structured-Finance Team From Dentons in Warsaw
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 2DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 3GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 4Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 5Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250