SDT judgment in landmark Locke Lord case reveals details of partner's 'dubious' £21m investment scheme and airport arrest
SDT judgment reveals ex-Locke Lord partner was arrested at Birmingham Airport in 2015 after questions over two-and-a-half-year investment scheme
November 13, 2017 at 08:52 AM
5 minute read
Locke Lord failed to prevent a London partner from using the firm's client account to run a "dubious" £21m investment scheme for two and a half years, despite enquiries from the FBI and the Metropolitan Police, a Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) judgment has revealed.
The judgment, published on Friday (10 November), contains full details of the background to the US firm's record £500,000 SDT fine, which it received last week after admitting a number of failings regarding its supervision of former banking and finance partner Jonathan Denton, who was arrested at Birmingham Airport in late 2015 after being fired from the firm that summer.
Denton – also a former partner at Mishcon de Reya, Salans and Wragge & Co – joined Locke Lord in March 2012, shortly after it launched a London office at the start of that year.
The judgment sets out how in July 2012, a company named Ikaya was incorporated with Denton as sole director and his wife as company secretary, along with a second company, Slonne, which "purported to operate… an investment scheme offering very high yields".
A client engagement letter was subsequently sent from the firm to Ikaya and Slonne, addressed to Denton on behalf of Ikaya, setting out a retainer and confirming that Denton would be the client partner – an issue the firm later noted as having created "a certain mixing" of his roles as Ikaya director and Locke Lord lawyer.
The judgment states that Denton and Locke Lord advised Ikaya "in relation to seven investment trusts during the retainer" between September 2012 and June 2015, during which time Denton billed a total of 1,424.9 hours, delivering invoices from the firm to Ikaya totalling £532,045, $657,194 and €286,902. Approximately £21m was paid into the firm's client account by investors during that period.
Despite Denton's efforts to assure those putting money into the scheme that their capital would be safe, and that he could achieve monthly returns of 6%, the judgment states that "there did not appear to be any verifiable returns to investors".
It adds that Denton used his status as a qualified lawyer to "promote the investment scheme to potential investors" and attempted to "lend credibility to the investment schemes" by meeting at least one potential investor at the firm's offices.
Questions began to be asked in 2013, when Locke Lord was contacted by the FBI over fears that $2m of an investor's money was at risk. The FBI was concerned that an individual involved in the transactions with "some history of prior investment fraud or irregularities" may have been trying to divert the funds for his personal use.
Later that year, the firm was contacted by the Metropolitan Police Service with regards to "the veracity" of £7m remitted from its Dallas office into the firm's client account – an enquiry which was fielded by Denton.
In 2014, after receiving more questions from investors, Locke Lord's compliance officer for legal practice (COLP) expressed concerns to the firm's general counsel that there had been "a certain mixing" of Denton's roles as a lawyer of the firm and a director of Ikaya.
After an April 2015 call from North Yorkshire Police regarding another investor complaint, Denton – who had already stepped down to an of counsel role – was fired and given three months' notice as of 23 July that year.
However, the COLP continued to forward enquiries from investors to Denton during his gardening leave, and he was permitted to continue using his firm email account.
On 10 October 2015, Denton was arrested at Birmingham Airport, five days before a telephone meeting took place between Locke Lord's COLP, general counsel, and several investors, with the intention of finding out where their money was being held. Denton was invited to attend the meeting but ignored calls, emails and text messages.
The tribunal was told that the firm has settled a number of claims with investors, but that it has been difficult to ascertain the sums involved. The firm's insurance has an excess of $2.5m, which has been paid.
Denton did not attend the tribunal and has been referred to the SDT after denying the allegations. The SRA also claims that he misled third parties by producing false invoices and knowingly made statements that he knew to be untrue. The allegations are subject to a hearing before the SDT.
Herbert Smith Freehills represented Locke Lord at the tribunal hearing, with litigation partners Tom Leech QC and David Reston leading the firm's team, while Capsticks partner Daniel Purcell acted for the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Locke Lord's £500,000 penalty is double the previous record SDT fine of £250,000 handed out to White & Case earlier this year for conflict and confidentiality failures.
While the firm admitted it failed to have effective systems and controls in place to identify and assess potential conflicts of interest, it said it had taken steps to to review existing practices and procedure and has made a number of "changes and improvements".
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance, Milbank Steer Yondr Group’s $900M Debt Financing in Malaysia
Kirkland, Paul Hastings, White & Case, Freshfields advise on Top German Deals
2 minute readKirkland Steers Paris-based Antin in ‘Year’s Biggest’ Infrastructure Fund Closing, at €10.2B
3 minute readVenezuela Faces Creditor Class Action Suit After Missing $1.5B Bond Payments
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250