Magic circle and US firms leading on Unilever's £6.5bn auction of its spreads business
Unilever is reportedly taking bids from four private equity houses for its spreads division
November 14, 2017 at 10:15 AM
2 minute read
Linklaters, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett are playing key roles on Unilever's auction of its £6.5bn spreads division.
The consumer goods giant is auctioning its margarine and spreads business, which includes products Flora and Stork, for about £6.5bn.
Sky News first reported that the final bidders for the business are private equity houses Apollo Global, CVC Capital Partners, KKR and Platinum Equity.
Unilever announced its plans to sell its spreads business in April, two months after US giant Kraft Heinz's unsuccessful £115bn merger bid for Unilever in February.
Linklaters is acting for Unilever on the auction, with the firm's co-head of consumer Paul McNicholl and London corporate partner Matthew Bland advising.
Freshfields is advising CVC with a team led by City private equity partner Charles Hayes.
Simpson Thacher is advising regular client KKR with a team including London private equity partner Ian Barratt and M&A partner Clare Gaskell.
While it is unclear which other firms are playing roles, Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison regularly acts for Apollo and Baker Mckenzie has advised Platinum Equity on previous transactions.
Slaughter and May has traditionally been the main corporate adviser to Unilever, but Linklaters has picked up a number of key mandates for the company in recent years.
A Linklaters team led by corporate head Aedamar Comiskey and corporate partners McNicholl and Nick Rumsby led on the defence of the Kraft Heinz bid earlier this year.
Other work the magic circle firm has done for the company includes advising on a $5.4bn (£4.5bn) deal to increase its stake in Hindustan Unilever, the publicly listed Indian subsidiary of the consumer goods giant, and acting on Unilever's €390m (£330m) acquisition of an 82% stake in Russian beauty company Concern Kalina in 2011.
All firms declined to comment. Unilever did not respond to requests for comment.
Photo credit: Sean Biehle
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic about M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readThe Law Firms Generating 8-Figure Fees on the Year's Big Ticket UK Deals
3 minute read'Significant' Competition Concerns Over £762M GXO Logistics-Wincanton Merger
Trending Stories
- 1$400M Case: Trustee Claims Instant Pot-Maker Defrauded Lenders
- 2NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing Efforts
- 3The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
- 4Bosworth Claims It Was Kline & Specter, Not Him, That Breached Settlement Terms
- 5K&L Gates Faces Malpractice Suit: 'An Experienced Labor Attorney Would Know'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250