Rise of the underdog: why sports partners are leaving bigger firms to launch their own boutiques
The departure of four Charles Russell Speechlys partners to launch a new boutique is the latest example of a trend for sports lawyers to strike out on their own
November 16, 2017 at 10:20 AM
4 minute read
The recent move by four Charles Russell Speechlys (CRS) partners to break away and launch specialist sports firm Northridge is just one example of a wider trend of sports and media lawyers leaving larger, more traditional firms to set up shop in tightly-focused boutiques.
Just weeks before the opening of Northridge, three former Couchmans partners launched City sports, media and entertainment boutique Level Law, while recent years have also seen the launch of sports-centric firms such as Manchester's Centrefield and London's Onside Law, by ex-lawyers from Brabners and Clifford Chance respectively.
Though small in terms of lawyers, these firms act for some of sport's best-known stars and biggest regulatory bodies. Northridge boast clients including the Football Association, the Welsh Rugby Union and England footballers Dele Alli (pictured right) and Raheem Sterling, while this summer Centrefield advised Manchester United on the £75m signing of star striker Romelu Lukaku (pictured above) from Everton. Both law firms have just four partners.
Centrefield founding partner Matthew Bennett attributes the sports spinoff trend to the financial demands that large firms place on partners in niche practice areas, as well as the appeal of managing client relationships more independently.
Bennett says: "As a smaller practice with a lower cost base, we are likely to have less pressure than larger firms in terms of overheads, turnover and profit targets, which enables us to offer more flexibility in how we charge and the services we can offer. That enables us to take a longer view with both existing and potential clients."
Co-founding partner David Bentham adds: "Larger firms differ in terms of individual targets on fee earners and the need for a more immediate financial return. Everyone in our firm is ambitious, but within bigger firms there is a more competitive environment between lawyers about who is doing what kinds of work."
Northridge co-founder and former CRS sport co-head Ian Lynam adds: "When you are a specialist with a particular sector focus, especially if that sector is within sport, having control over how you go to market, work, bill clients and work internally is very valuable."
Bennett and Bentham also refer to the importance of visibility in the sports field. Having people know your expertise and being easily approachable, they say, is key.
"We felt there would be more clarity about our services if we were not packaged as part of a multi-practice law firm," Bennett says, "We felt a strong and clear brand would make it easier for clients in the sector to identify us, rather than having to click through multiple webpages of a larger law firm."
Level Law founding partner Daniel Lowen similarly points to the need for specialist sports lawyers to be client-facing.
Lowen says: "We focus on the fact that the majority of clients in the sports business want a senior and trusted expert who genuinely understands their industry, business or activities, pressures and opportunities.
"One of the advantages of a more streamlined firm is that a potential client who is not sure where to turn can pick up the phone and be speaking with a genuine expert in the field within seconds. Ultimately, we felt that a lot of the constraints associated with traditional law firms are avoidable when you are servicing a client with who you have that level of relationship."
The emergence of boutique sports firms has also coincided with the growth in "scale and sophistication" of the sports and media industry, according to Lynam. With that, he says, "the level of legal services required has got more complex".
Lowen says: "The rapid pace of development in the sports industry is incredible – there are profound changes in the sports media field; for example, new entrants, new technologies, new ways of consuming sports content, the irrepressible rise of e-sports, major governance and integrity issues, and spiralling transfer fees.
"Of course, that means there is an ever-growing need for senior experts who can assist their clients to navigate through fast-moving and sometimes uncharted territory. I think the reality is that as the industry matures and develops, clients appreciate the deep relationships we build with them and the added value that we bring."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIs KPMG’s Arizona ABS Strategy a Turning Point in U.S. Law? What London’s Experience Reveals
5 minute readKPMG Moves to Provide Legal Services in the US—Now All Eyes Are on Its Big Four Peers
International Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250