'This is about the future' - Keystone's James Knight on the thinking behind the firm's IPO
Keystone's founder explains why the firm decided to become the third to list on the London Stock Exchange
November 16, 2017 at 10:02 AM
4 minute read
"This listing is about the future," says James Knight, founder and managing director of Keystone Law, which today (16 November) confirmed that it will become the third law firm to float on the London Stock Exchange (LSE).
The initial public offering (IPO), which will take place on 27 November, has been in the making since early last year, when Knight first began thinking about taking the plunge.
As with the first two UK firms to list – Gateley and Gordon Dadds – Keystone will join LSE's AIM market, becoming Keystone Law Group plc. The move will leave the firm with no debt, lock in senior management and shareholders for up to two years, and fuel its strategy for future growth.
Knight explains: "The public market provides a solid platform for us to move forward within. We have been ambitious, and this kind of stable platform is something we believe will help us grow.
"I think Keystone as a firm and business model is suited to this kind of market, and it will also be a good thing for how we are recognised and perceived by clients and other lawyers."
Keystone, which was founded in 2002, was initially conceived as a 'virtual' law firm, with lawyers working remotely rather than from an expensive, central location. However, in recent years, the firm has opened a string of bases across the UK, as well as in Guernsey and Sydney, Australia. According to its website, key clients include RBS, RSA, Siemens and Virgin Atlantic.
The firm is hoping to raise £15m from the float, based on a placing price of 160p per share, valuing it at £50m. Of the capital raised, £7.4m will be used to pay off shareholder debt relating to private equity firm Root Capital's £3.15m investment in 2014, which the firm received after converting to an alternative business structure in 2013, a move that enabled it to take on external capital.
After these debts and IPO-related costs have been paid, Keystone will be debt-free, and the remaining capital will be ploughed into the business.
"Fundamentally, the IPO doesn't represent any deviation from our existing business model. When you do these things you go around to the institutions and fund managers to gauge appetite and get allocations, and the offering was substantially oversubscribed.
"The reason why investors have been so bullish is because they see the Keystone model as the model for the future – particularly in the mid-market – and wholeheartedly believe in the concept of this very different business model," says Knight.
While Knight is keen to stress that the IPO will not prompt Keystone to diverge from its current strategy, the firm intends to draw on new capital resources to expand its geographic reach, which is currently primarily focused on London and the south of the UK.
The IPO will lock in all existing shareholders and management for a period of one to two years, depending on their roles. And while the firm's 260 lawyers will not be offered share options as part of the float, they will of course be able to buy shares in the firm "in the usual way", according to Knight.
He adds: "Equity in traditional law firms is fraught with politics, risks and a there are great deal of strings attached. It stands for something very different from this, which is much more easy and transparent."
- LegalWeek Connect – a business conference for business people in law firms, featuring a big-name line-up of speakers – is taking place on 29-30 November at London's Institution of Engineering and Technology. Click here to find out more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Lawyers Waging the Legal Fight Against the Trump Administration
- 2McDermott's Onetime London Leader Headed to Pillsbury
- 3A&O Shearman To Lose Another Five Lawyers to EY
- 4Pearl Cohen Enters San Francisco Market Via Combination With IP Boutique
- 5'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250