Lockstep, law firm listings and a distinct lack of diversity – the best of Legal Week last week
The best news, interviews and analysis from Legal Week over the last seven days
November 20, 2017 at 11:13 AM
3 minute read
Is lockstep still lockstep if there are multiple gates, and the top third of the ladder isn't accessible to at least 90% of equity partners? As growing numbers of UK firms drift ever further from traditional lockstep in the battle for talent, does it even matter?
Reforms voted in by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer partners last week make the firm the latest to radically overhaul its lockstep – with partners approving changes that usher in a £3m top of lockstep for a handful of stars, while empowering management to better control the progress of those lower down through the use of three gates.
Though the changes are radical, there is still a question as to whether they go far enough to help Freshfields' retain top performing junior and mid-level partners against US advances, given they do not give management the ability to accelerate partners' progress up the ladder.
Elsewhere, Keystone Law announced plans for far more fundamental changes than a lockstep overhaul. The previously 'virtual' law firm confirmed that it is set to become the third UK law firm to list on the London Stock Exchange, with founder James Knight setting out his reasoning in an interview with Legal Week.
Other highlights include a piece looking at the firms planning to introduce targets to boost black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) representation among their lawyers, and a feature looking at the experiences of some BAME lawyers and why they think that firms need to change.
The best of the rest of Legal Week last week:
- Ashurst sees third London partner quit in three weeks
- Are US firms winning in London? Separating fact from fiction
- SDT judgment in landmark Locke Lord case reveals details of partner's dubious £21m investment scheme
- EDF Energy begins review of 14-strong UK panel
- Dentons launches in-house consulting venture with more than 50 former GCs
- Ireland launches post-Brexit charm offensive to convince more law firms to launch in Dublin
- Rise of the underdog: why sports partners are leaving bigger firms to launch their own boutiques
- Quinn Emanuel set for Middle East launch with Qatar licence
- Herbert Smith Freehills and Hogan Lovells miss gender targets as firms grapple with diversity conundrum
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250