Pinsents sued by Spanish firm Ramon & Cajal over Madrid partner hires after unsuccessful merger talks
Pinsents senior partner Richard Foley and TMT head Clive Seddon named as defendants
November 30, 2017 at 09:49 AM
4 minute read
Pinsent Masons is being sued by Spanish firm Ramon & Cajal, over allegations that it breached a number of agreements by hiring a team of its partners and associates following unsuccessful merger talks between the two firms.
Documents filed at London's High Court detail the Spanish firm's claim against Pinsents, which also names the firm's senior partner Richard Foley, TMT head Clive Seddon and Madrid head and former Ramon board member Diego Lozano as defendants.
According to the claim, Pinsents and Ramon engaged in merger talks between October and December 2016, culminating in a merger offer made to Ramon on 19 December.
Ramon equity partners rejected the offer by a majority on 21 December. Managing partner Francisco Pala communicated the decision to Foley the following day and asked him to consider an alliance between the two firms instead, according to the document.
The claim states that between January and May 2017, Pinsents agreed to hire five Ramon partners, all seven of its full-time corporate associates and two banking associates.
It also states that Pinsents tried to hire Ramon banking partner Cristina Vida, but she rebuffed their approaches.
The partners that joined Pinsents were Lozano, who had played a key part in the negotiations between the two firms, corporate partners Sanchez Montero and Inmaculada Castello Bernabeu, finance partner Idoya Arteagabeitia and litigation partner Fernando Gutierrez.
Ramon argues that the hires breached a no-hiring provision contained in a memorandum of understanding between the two firms signed in July 2016, and also breached a non-solicitation provision in a non-disclosure agreement between the firms signed in October 2016.
It also claims that Pinsents used confidential data provided to them in the merger talks between the two firms, including which of its partners had the most profitable practice and which of its clients were the most profitable, in its solicitation of its lawyers.
According to the documents, Lozano and Sanchez Montero were two of the firm's three most profitable partners.
As evidence of the alleged solicitation, the firm points to a presentation given by Seddon to a group of its associates at the Hesperia Hotel in Madrid, where he pitched Pinsents' vision for its Madrid office in an attempt to get them to join the firm.
According to the documents, this included its intention to invest €10m (£8.8m) in its Madrid office with a view to engaging at least 60 lawyers in the forthcoming five years.
Ramon is claiming that, but for the defendants' actions, its lawyers would still be working for the firm and generating profits, and that it is entitled to claim these lost profits in addition to any profits made by the defendants as a result of their breach of confidence.
It also claims that Lozano is obliged to disgorge to the firm any gain received by him as a result of his breach of duty to the firm.
A Pinsents spokesperson said: "We are disappointed by this litigation, which we do not believe has merit. As we build our business, we take great care to meet the responsibilities we agree to as part of our discussions with individuals and firms alike. We believe we have always met our responsibilities in relation to Ramon & Cajal and regret they have chosen to take this action. Given formal proceedings are underway, it would not be appropriate for us to make further comment."
Ramon has instructed Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner Richard East, while Pinsents has turned to Ashurst litigation partner James Levy.
Pinsents opened its Madrid office in May with the Ramon partner hires, who were joined by projects and construction partner Ricardo Garcia from construction firm OHL and construction partner Sofia Parra, who relocated from Pinsents' London office.
Quinn declined to comment. Ramon was contacted for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClaus von Wobeser: Mexico's ‘Godfather of Arbitration’ Becomes Firm’s Honorary Chair
Slaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250