Pinsents sets out defence in dispute over Spanish partner hires from former merger target
Firm files response to lawsuit from Ramon & Cajal over contentious partner hires
December 05, 2017 at 09:18 AM
3 minute read
Pinsent Masons has set out its defence to a lawsuit filed by Spain's Ramon & Cajal over a team of partners who moved between the firms following failed merger talks.
The Spanish firm sued Pinsents after the firm hired a group of its partners and associates to launch a Madrid office following unsuccessful merger negotiations last year.
Ramon claims that the hires breached a memorandum of understanding (MOU) which included a "non-hiring clause", and a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) which contained a "no solicitation" clause.
In the UK firm's defence, filed today (5 December) at the High Court, the firm argues that the MOU between the two firms was not signed by Pinsents.
The lawsuit stems from talks held between the two firms in 2016, prior to which they had an informal relationship which had been established in late 2013 by Pinsents TMT head Clive Seddon and Ramon partner Diego Lozano.
In February 2016, Pinsents approached Ramon about working towards a more formal relationship with the view to a potential future merger.
Pinsents subsequently prepared the first draft of a proposed MOU for a three-year 'preferred law firm' relationship, with Lozano requesting the inclusion of a 12-month 'non-hiring' clause, which he discussed with Seddon.
Seddon presented a proposed draft of the non-hiring clause to Lozano, but the claim states that when Seddon emailed Pinsents managing partner John Cleland to ask if he was happy to sign the MOU with the amendments, Cleland said he did not consider the the non-hiring clause to be appropriate, and that he would require board authority to agree to such a restriction.
Cleland – who the claim states believed that at the time that the MOU had been signed – subsequently emailed Lozano to ask that the non-hiring provision be reduced to six months rather than a year.
The claim states that the MOU was never signed by Pinsents, and when a full merger between the two firms was proposed in mid-July 2016, Cleland told Lozano that "the parties should not waste further time on seeking to agree the terms of the MOU".
The proposed merger was rejected by Ramon's partners in late December, with only three – including Lozano and fellow corporate partner Sanchez Montero – voting in favour of a deal.
The claim argues that the five partners that subsequently left Ramon to join Pinsents were not solicited but rather, independently approached Pinsents to ask to join as founding members of the UK firm's Madrid office. It states that in rejecting the merger proposal, Ramon's partners "ought reasonably" to have forseen that there was a risk that partners "in the most internationally focused practice groups" would leave to join a global law firm.
Ramon has also argued that Pinsents made use of confidential information provided during the merger talks, but in its defence, Pinsents claims that their existing referral relationship would have meant that the details in the NDA would have already been known to Pinsents.
Ramon is being represented by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner Richard East, while Pinsents has turned to Ashurst litigation partner James Levy. Ashurst has instructed Blackstone Chambers employment junior Thomas Croxford.
Pinsents opened its Madrid office in May this year with the Ramon partner hires, who were joined by projects and construction partner Ricardo Garcia from construction firm OHL and construction partner Sofia Parra, who relocated from Pinsents' London office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
- 1Jefferson Doctor Hit With $6.8M Verdict Over Death of 64-Year-Old Cancer Patient
- 2Seven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 1
- 3What Went Wrong With Adeel Mangi's Long, Strange Trip Through the Judicial Nomination Process?
- 4Defense Counsel Turns $2.2 Million Broward Jury Verdict to $500K
- 5United Soccer League Scores General Counsel
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250