Firms eye Qatar 2022 World Cup roles as delivery committee sounds out potential new advisers
Qatar's Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy approaches firms ahead of 2022 event
December 07, 2017 at 04:47 AM
2 minute read
The organisation overseeing preparations for the 2022 World Cup in Qatar has begun approaching law firms to bolster its stable of legal advisers in the run-up to to the event.
Qatar's Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy – which was established in 2011 after the country was named as host of the 2022 tournament – is responsible for delivering the new stadiums, non-competition venues and infrastructure for the event.
The committee is known to have already worked with a number of law firms in the region, including Clifford Chance (CC), DLA Piper, Bird & Bird and Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, but it is understood that it has recently contacted others about providing additional advice.
One source close to the process told Legal Week that the organisation could formalise its existing law firm relationships under a panel arrangement, and that at least two firms have had informal conversations with the committee about the process.
In 2013, CC announced that the Supreme Committee had appointed the magic circle firm to advise on its infrastructure programme, including the construction of the Lusail Stadium which will host the final and the opening and closing ceremonies.
The same year, Bird & Bird opened an office in Dubai and cited the Supreme Committee as one of its recent client wins in the Middle East.
DLA's website, meanwhile, states that the firm has advised the Supreme Committee on "partnership arrangements for the development of a stadium and tournament infrastructure and the legacy redevelopment of one of the 2022 Football World Cup tournament sites".
In the last two years, a number of firms have pulled out of the Doha market, including CC and Herbert Smith Freehills, which closed their offices this year, and Latham & Watkins, which shut down its Doha and Abu Dhabi bases in 2015.
The Supreme Committee declined to comment.
- Be recognised for leading the pack, for innovating in your sector and for working on precedent-setting projects and initiatives. We are now taking submissions for the Middle East Legal Awards, which are hosted by Legal Week and the Association of Corporate Counsel Middle East chapter. The ceremony will take place on 19 April in Dubai - click here to read entry criteria, view categories & submit your entry.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Setting Standards: Vanguard Australia's Sean Hughes on Moving From Government Regulator to Corporate General Counsel
6 minute read
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
- 1Attorneys ‘On the Move’: Morrison Cohen Adds White Collar Partner; Corporate/Securities Partner Joins Olshan
- 2Jury Says $118M: Netlist Wins Another Patent Verdict Against Samsung
- 3Big Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace For Changes Under Trump
- 4Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 5Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
