HSF brings in new powers to reward top performers as partners vote through lockstep extension
Firm introduces lockstep 'extension zone' running to 130 points to reward star performers
December 08, 2017 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) partners have voted through changes to the firm's remuneration system, which will extend the top of its lockstep in an effort to attract and retain top talent.
The firm's star performers will now be able to move above the previous 100-point top of lockstep into an 'extension zone' reaching up to 130 points.
Partners approved the changes earlier this week, after receiving two weeks to consider the proposals. The changes will come into affect from 1 May 2018.
The firm's core lockstep runs from 43 to 100 points, and management has had the ability to hold or move down partners based on performance since moving to a modified system after the 2012 merger of Herbert Smith and Australia's Freehills. Prior to the tie-up, Herbert Smith operated a pure eight-year lockstep.
While HSF said there would be no changes to the balanced scorecard criteria by which partner performance is assessed, it is expected that the firm will ramp up its focus on performance, with more emphasis placed on what partners are bringing into the business as opposed to their length of service.
One partner said: "We want to protect the culture and good processes from the past, but we also have to modernise and make the firm progressive. We only envisage a few of the most outstanding contributors going though into the extension zone."
The change comes after a series of partner departures for the firm in recent months, with many leaving for better-paying international rivals. Energy co-heads Anna Howell and John Balsdon quit for Gibson Dunn & Crutcher and Latham & Watkins respectively, while last month Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton recruited London litigation partner James Norris-Jones.
The firm's most recent LLP accounts, filed in February, revealed that the best-paid partner for 2015-16 received £1.6m.
One London partner said: "The world's changing – nobody's models will look the same in a decade. I think we're doing the sensible thing."
Another added: "For me, I think this is a sensible, moderate and relatively straightforward change. However, it is how much money people get paid and did need careful consideration."
According to one partner, one proposal considered was that the bottom of the ladder be brought down from 43 to about 35 points, although this was not taken forward.
Other considerations had included introducing lower lockstep ladders in certain offices. The firm already operates a separate ladder in Australia and Johannesburg, which runs from about 30 to 80 points. No different ladders for other international offices have been introduced.
In a statement, the firm said: "We have introduced some new elements of enhanced flexibility. These include a wider spread of equity positions on our ladder to address different levels of contribution.
"The changes ensure that our remuneration system continues to support the business as we implement our global strategies, improves flexibility to reflect the different markets in which we operate, and incentivises teams to deliver the best service from the whole firm to our clients."
The firm operates a partner bonus pool, which allows up to 5% of profits to be used to boost pay for star performers. Bonuses will now be paid out in two instalments annually instead of four, with no change to the size of the profit pool they come from.
A number of other major UK firms are currently pushing through changes to their lockstep, including Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, which recently overhauled its remuneration system with the introduction of a new single ladder that will enable top performers to make six times more than those at the bottom. It will see all partners joining the lockstep at 12 points, with a new top of lockstep rising to 60 points.
The core ladder will run from 12 points to 40 points, with everything above this only applying to star performers and those in competitive markets such as New York.
Clifford Chance, meanwhile, is ramping up its focus on partner performance with more rigorous appraisals that will more closely tie partner pay with performance than ever before. The appraisals come on the back of changes to CC's lockstep, introduced in May, which stretched the top of the lockstep and recalculated profit units.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStars and Gripes: Merging Firms Need a ‘Superstar Culture’ to Crack the U.S.
6 minute read'If You Have the Offering, India Is the Shining Star': International Firms on Building Up Their India Desks
Trending Stories
- 1Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 2Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 3Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 4Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
- 5Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250