Appleby drafts in Osborne Clarke as it pursues the Guardian and BBC over 'Paradise Paper' hack
BBC and Guardian set to defend themselves as offshore firm Appleby launches breach of confidence proceedings
December 18, 2017 at 12:51 PM
4 minute read
Appleby, the offshore law firm at the centre of the data hack dubbed the 'Paradise Papers', has turned to Osborne Clarke for advice as it plans legal action against The Guardian and the BBC.
The offshore firm confirmed that it has instructed top 30 UK firm Osborne Clarke as it plans to launch breach of confidence proceedings against both news outlets. Commercial litigation partner Ashley Hurst is advising the firm.
Appleby's plans were leaked to German newspaper Suddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) and then passed on to the US-based International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ).
According to reports in The Guardian, Appleby has also demanded that The Guardian and the BBC disclose any of the six million Appleby documents used to inform their reports following the hack. The newspaper has confirmed that it intends to defend the legal action.
In a statement, an Appleby spokesperson said: "Our overwhelming responsibility is to our clients and our own colleagues who have had their private and confidential information taken, in what was a criminal act. We need to know firstly which of their – and our – documents were taken. We would want to explain in detail to our clients and our colleagues the extent to which their confidentiality has been attacked.
"Despite repeated requests, the journalists have failed to provide to us copies of the stolen documents they claim to have seen. For this reason, Appleby is obliged to take legal action in order to ascertain what information has been stolen."
A BBC spokesperson said: "The BBC will strongly defend its role and conduct in the Paradise Papers project. Our serious and responsible journalism is resulting in revelations which are clearly of the highest public interest and has revealed matters which would otherwise have remained secret. Already we are seeing authorities taking action as a consequence."
A Guardian spokesperson added: "We can confirm that a claim has been issued against The Guardian. The claim does not challenge the truth of the stories we published. Instead, it is an attempt to undermine our responsible public interest journalism and to force us to to disclose documents that we regard as journalistic material.
"This claim could have serious consequences for investigative journalism in the UK. Ninety-six of the world's most respected media organisations concluded there was significant public interest in undertaking the Paradise Papers project and hundreds of articles have been published in recent weeks as a result of the work undertaken by partners. We will be defending ourselves vigorously against this claim, as we believe our reporting was responsible and a matter of legitimate public interest."
Appleby is one of the world's best-known offshore law firms. Besides Bermuda, Appleby also has offices in the British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Hong Kong, Mauritius, Seychelles and Shanghai, as well as the tax-friendly Crown Dependencies of Guernsey, the Isle of Man and Jersey.
Its major clients include Uber, Apple, Nike, Glencore and accounting giants KPMG, EY and PwC, according to the ICIJ.
At the time of the hack, the firm said in a statement that having "thoroughly and vigorously investigated the allegations" they were "satisfied that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing, either on the part of ourselves or our clients".
The ICIJ said the documents revealed "how deeply the offshore financial system is entangled with the overlapping worlds of political players, private wealth and corporate giants, […] that avoid taxes through increasingly imaginative bookkeeping manoeuvres".
Clifford Chance, Allen & Overy, Berwin Leighton Paisner and Clyde & Co were among a number of major law firms named in the leaked documents.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRivals Seize Opportunity as A&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells Vacate South Africa
5 minute readSwiss Lawyers Sanctioned by U.S. Treasury Over Russia Denounce 'Political' Accusations
3 minute readExclusive: Mayer Brown Shutters Mexico City Office, Lawyers Scatter
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250