Matrix Chambers acting for 121 female BBC employees as gender pay furore grows
Matrix picks up role on BBC gender pay gap dispute as Mishcon advises separate group including Carrie Gracie
January 09, 2018 at 07:59 AM
4 minute read
Matrix Chambers is representing the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) in a group complaint relating to the BBC's gender pay gap, as it emerges that former BBC News China editor Carrie Gracie is among at least 10 senior female employees being advised by Mishcon de Reya.
The NUJ has instructed Matrix barrister Claire Darwin, who specialises in employment, discrimination and education, on a complaint on behalf of 121 female BBC employees over pay disparity between male and female workers.
The chambers joins Mishcon de Reya, which is advising a number of senior female BBC employees – including Gracie – on separate potential legal action relating to pay differences. Gracie has quit her role after four years and this week wrote an open letter citing a "secretive and illegal pay culture" at the broadcaster.
Mishcon employment partner Jennifer Millins is advising the group, which includes presenters named among the corporation's top earners in its annual report published this July. Employees are currently understood to be pursuing internal complaints with the corporation as a precursor to any later litigation.
Commenting on Gracie's resignation, Millins said: "The BBC may have hoped that its reported gender pay gap of 9.3%, around half the national average, would go some way to compensate for negative headlines it garnered on the issue last year. However, the BBC's gender pay gap figure is not an answer to individual equal pay complaints.
"As Carrie Gracie's resignation shows, failing to pay men and women who are doing the same work the same amount of pay can create a lack of trust between an organisation and its employees. Failing to deal promptly with internal grievances only serves to exacerbate this distrust, and in itself is a breach of an employer's obligations."
The report, published in July last year, revealed significant disparity in salaries for top male and female earners and prompted the BBC to appoint Eversheds Sutherland and PwC to carry out an audit of its pay structure. The audit did not deal with on-air presenters, editors and correspondents, whose pay is set to be examined in a separate review.
The report was overseen by retired Appeal Court judge Sir Patrick Elias QC and cleared the corporation of "systematic gender discrimination", but made a number of recommendations about how it could improve its practices.
Of the 96 individuals revealed in July's pay report to be earning more than £150,000, only 34 were women. Radio 2 presenter Chris Evans is the highest-paid man, taking home £2.2m-£2.25m – far outstripping the £450,000-£499,999 earned by the highest-paid woman, Strictly Come Dancing co-host Claudia Winkleman.
The report also included three of the BBC's in-house lawyers – group general counsel Sarah Jones, who earns between £200,000 and £249,999, and head of legal Peter Farrell and assistant general counsel Peter Ranyard, who are both paid between £150,000 and £199,999.
A BBC spokesperson said: "Fairness in pay is vital. A significant number of organisations have now published their gender pay figures showing that we are performing considerably better than many and are well below the national average. Alongside that, we have already conducted an independent judge led audit of pay for rank and file staff which showed "no systemic discrimination against women". A separate report for on air staff will be published in the not too distant future."
The NUJ was contacted for comment, Matrix Chambers declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250