Best Legal Advisers 2017-18: DAC Beachcroft
DAC Beachcroft managing partner David Pollitt on what makes the firm a Best Legal Adviser for 2017-18
January 17, 2018 at 07:47 AM
4 minute read
David Pollitt, managing partner at DAC Beachcroft, talks to Legal Week Intelligence about what makes the firm a Best Legal Adviser for 2017-18
How do you ensure the legal advice you are giving is commercially relevant? A client's experience is often deep and narrow in relation to their business, and what they get from us is a wider experience that can be layered on top to make sure they're guiding their business in accordance with the way things are going in the market, so that market context is vital. We know from dealing with X number of clients in this particular sector that certain things are done in certain types of ways. That comes from experience and it comes from working hard within the law firm. Secondments are also an example of how we invest in our clients and can provide advice that is really tuned into their business. It allows us to see what they like and what they don't like, so it's hugely valuable.
In what ways are you innovating to improve client services? We innovate every day but we just don't realise it. At the moment, innovation is becoming confused with artificial intelligence and technology, and the suggestion that there needs to be some whizzy thing behind the human in order for something to be innovative. Wrong. Quite often, innovation is driven by technology but by no means exclusively. There isn't a eureka moment that's redefining the way that we do things; more often than not it's just people saying: why don't we do this slightly differently, or why don't we apply something we learnt here over there? While we have examples of technological advances that we've made and AI that we're investing in, a lot of innovation simply comes from people bringing fresh thinking, improving the way that we do things and applying that for the benefit of our clients. One example is around the work that we do for some of our real estate clients, which involves us handling the leasing arrangements for large shopping centres. We know a lot about what certain retail companies might want and what their expectations are around tenancy terms, so we've created teams that know the tenant and we understand before we've even picked up the phone to the solicitor acting for the tenant precisely what the points are going to be and we can clear those with the client. That serves to accelerate the process, getting the tenant in more quickly and getting the rent paid more quickly to our client.
How do you seek to deliver value for money to clients? I've always worked on the basis that value for money is the product of quality and price. It's not necessarily the cheapest option, but price is a key part of value for money, as is the quality of advice, and by quality I mean both the legal and commercial content. Value for money can really encompass so much and you've almost got to take yourself up from the detail, but for us there are really four reasons why clients keep coming back. It's a combination of us understanding the client's business, it's about our commitment to trying to help them achieve what they want to achieve, and a big part of it is the relationships and the personal chemistry. The final element why people come back is value for money and on that it is really people recognising when they come to us that it's a combination of all those things, about our willingness to support them, our interest in their business and the way that we deliver our services in a friendly, unstuffy, accessible way – all of that goes into value for money.
What clients like about the firm: 1. High quality of work and expertise. 2. The ability to understand client needs and respond proactively. 3. Overall the firm has fabulous expertise and response times. They are efficient in that they normally respond by return or as soon as practicable.
DAC Beachcroft's top scores: 1. Quality of legal advice (4.4) 2. Communication and responsiveness (4.4) 3. Commercial approach and understanding of my business (4.4)
For more information visit: www.dacbeachcroft.com
The Best Legal Advisers Report will be published in February 2018. For more information email [email protected] or call her on +44 (0) 203 868 7545 .
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSome Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
4 minute readKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Trending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250