Best Legal Advisers 2017-18: RPC
RPC managing partner James Miller on what makes the firm a Best Legal Adviser for 2017-18
January 17, 2018 at 07:45 AM
3 minute read
James Miller, managing partner at RPC, talks to Legal Week Intelligence about what makes the firm a Best Legal Adviser for 2017-18
How do you ensure the legal advice you are giving is commercially relevant? If you don't understand your client's business, you're not going to be able to advise them. The days of just advising on black letter law absent the set of circumstances it fits in are long gone – it's got to be seen in a commercial context. We champion internally those who are exceptional at this, so we use a lot of internal role models and we try and recruit with that in mind. While obviously people have to have the correct academics, we go into quite a lot of depth and detail about their wider commercial understanding when we're interviewing. Unless you understand your client's business, you're never going to be able to put the advice into context.
In what ways are you innovating to improve client services? We innovate when it gives our clients an advantage. Every business we work with is different, so it is really about demand. For example, we've developed an in-house 24/7 cloud-based management information system, which can collect and display a client's claims history in real time. We've also provided a significant online database resource for general counsel, with common issues they face in their roles. And the most recent thing we have introduced is for cyber breaches, which puts in place for clients a technical solution, a PR solution and if they need a legal solution then we're there to do that; and we've got that running in Europe and Asia.
How do you seek to deliver clients value for money? For me and my experience with clients, it's all about achieving the correct commercial outcome, and value and price does play a very significant part. Sometimes you get a matter that's worth a relatively small amount in terms of monetary value but it's very important to that client for other reasons; conversely it might be worth a lot of money but they don't want to spend a lot of money on it because they can offset the liability somewhere else, so commercially we say have we delivered what they hoped we would achieve. If you've got a £10,000 dispute which to rectify will cost £30,000, you have to have that conversation upfront because the worst thing you can do is to surprise clients – if you surprise them you're in difficulty, so it's all about communication. It's all a bit like a marriage: if you communicate openly and regularly then 90% of the problems don't occur in the first place.
What clients like about the firm: 1. Excellent understanding of insurance market, good relationship with associates and partners. 2. Understanding of our business, responsiveness, commercial. 3. Excellent communication and good quality legal advice. Go above and beyond to help in any way that they can.
RPC's top scores: 1. Communication and responsiveness (4.7) 2. Quality of legal advice (4.7) 3. Partner-level contact (4.6)
For more information visit: www.rpc.co.uk
The Best Legal Advisers Report will be published in February 2018. For more information email [email protected] or call her on +44 (0) 203 868 7545 .
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250