Susskind urges in-house lawyers to stop 'tolerating' old-fashioned law firms
Legal tech futurist heralds "open source concept of legal content" at Corporate Legal Operations Consortium's inaugural London conference
January 24, 2018 at 08:12 AM
3 minute read
Professor Richard Susskind has called on in-house lawyers to revolutionise their approach to legal services, saying they have "tolerated" old-fashioned law firm methods for too long.
He was speaking at the Corporate Legal Operations Consortium's (CLOC) inaugural London conference, which took place yesterday (23 January) on the back of the organisation's European launch last year.
CLOC, which was founded in the US in 2010, describes itself as the 'go-to' organisation for information about legal operations and networking opportunities for specialists in this line of work.
More than 180 legal operations professionals, GCs, lawyers and technology providers attended the London event, which focused on the rise of legal operations professionals and how they can drive change in the legal sector.
Susskind – who opened the conference alongside CLOC chief executive Connie Brenton – highlighted the rise of technology and the role of legal operations in breaking down traditional ways of working.
"In-house lawyers have tolerated law firms' old-fashioned ways of working. Clients don't want just professionals; they want the outcomes they bring, and different ways of delivering them," he said. "CLOC is a collective voice, and in-house lawyers can reconceptualise how legal services are delivered. The future of legal services is within the grasp of CLOC."
Commenting on driving through change and cost savings, Susskind said: "Even before the economic downturn, GCs were under pressure to reduce legal spend and headcount. There is now less resource and more demand. We can either be more efficient and cut costs that way, or use a collaboration strategy and share the costs.
"We are moving towards an open source concept of legal content. There are growing groups of in-house functions coming together to share techniques and content. We need to be more sophisticated about sharing."
Susskind criticised the view held by some that artificial intelligence (AI) has already significantly impacted the legal sector, arguing that the most important changes are still to come. "AI is now a verb – I hear people saying: 'We can AI that'. People are just talking almost randomly about these technologies.
"The short-term predictions overstate the impact. However, in the long term, by the late 2020s or 2030s, it is hard to avoid the the conclusion that this isn't going to replace fundamental parts of legal services."
Other speakers at the event included legal operations heads from Google, Facebook, BT, Vodafone and Gap, as well as Barclays relationship management head Chris Grant and Cisco deputy general counsel Steve Harmon.
Sessions looked at subjects including escalating legal operations from the ground up, how to challenge traditional operating models in legal departments, and a discussion on effective legal panel management.
CLOC president Brenton, chief of staff and senior director of legal operations at US data management company Netapp, commented: "The role of the GC has changed – the industry is moving at a quick pace and we can barely keep up with the changes. If you don't have an operations role, it is going to be irresponsible. You can't run a legal department without operational efficiency."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
Pinsent Masons Launches AML Artificial Intelligence Tool in Wake of SRA Crackdown
3 minute readGowling WLG’s Commitment to AI and Innovation Attracts New Director of AI
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250