'We do not want a school-like culture' - Slaughters shakes up associate appraisals and drops performance scores
Magic circle firm to appoint dedicated 'continuity' partners to improve associate development
January 25, 2018 at 07:53 AM
4 minute read
Slaughter and May has overhauled its associate appraisal system, with performance scores dropped in favour of more ongoing feedback and mentoring by dedicated 'continuity' partners.
The magic circle firm's associates were previously measured against three categories – legal, business development and interpersonal – but following a six-month review, the firm has decided to drop the points system, which was used to give a numerical indication of the level of performance expected of its associates.
Slaughter and May executive partner Paul Stacey said: "We are dropping all scores for associate appraisals. That was very much driven by associates. Our very clever people, who are working very hard, said: 'We do not want a school-like culture.' We think the problem with scores is that people focus on the numbers, and that's not a helpful way of taking their career forward.
"We want to actually get people to have a proper conversation about their future career and development. When you have that conversation, while we will recall how well people have done, the other focus will be on looking forward to see how your career as an associate is developing."
Slaughters has been working with leadership and talent consultancy MDV on the review, which kicked off in the summer last year and concluded this month. Associates and partners were invited to provide input for the review at two focus groups, with the results of those meetings presented in September.
While the firm has decided to retain annual appraisals, it is also bringing in more ongoing feedback for associates alongside the appointment of 'continuity' partners to oversee their development.
The continuity partners, who are set to be appointed in March, will take long-term responsibility for mentoring associates. "The continuity partners will sit down and be with associates over a number of years and attend their annual reviews," Stacey explains. "We want to provide continuity in that review. Both the continuity partner and the partner that has worked most closely with an associate will be present at the appraisal."
For many associates, a mentoring arrangement already exists, and these partners will be assigned as their continuity partners, but in other larger groups, they will be introduced for the first time.
Partners will be encouraged to provide feedback to associates either at the end of transactions if they are shorter, such as M&A or financing deals, or at key points during a longer mandate, such as an ongoing investigation.
Stacey added: "Associates need to know how they are doing in the moment, rather than at the end of the year."
Last year Slaughters moved away from performance-based pay for junior lawyers, with the associate pay system now mirroring the flat lockstep structure of the firm's partnership.
The appraisal process remains unlinked to pay, and there will also be no formal targets put into place under the new system. "We are not a target-based culture," Stacey said. "We will have a conversation with associates about how they can develop their careers and take forward their legal, business and interpersonal skills."
In addition, the firm has introduced 'recovery time' to ensure that associates working long hours on transactions are given back hours in lieu. The idea was first raised in July as part of the appraisal review and officially launched in September.
"Our partners are given recovery time guidance to make sure there is consistency across associates. We have systems that generate this information, and it goes to the partners who then decide the appropriate amount of time off for the associates."
Last year Slaughters introduced a raft of other benefits for associates, including a four-week paid sabbatical at three years' post-qualification experience (PQE), as well as the opportunity to work from home one day a week.
In December the firm announced associate salary increases, with newly qualified lawyers now paid £80,000 and lawyers with one year's PQE receiving £88,000. 2PQE and 3PQE associates are paid £98,500 and £108,000 respectively.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250