Linklaters criticised for alleged errors in professional negligence claim over Arsenal share sale
Claim brought by former Arsenal shareholder sheds light on magic circle firm's role in fate of Arsenal ownership
February 05, 2018 at 10:55 AM
4 minute read
The details of former Arsenal shareholder Lady Nina Bracewell-Smith's professional negligence claim against Linklaters have been laid out in a new High Court filing, which suggests that the law firm's errors played a part in her decision to sell her shares to the club's current majority owner, US businessman Stan Kroenke.
The magic circle firm and big four accountants Deloitte are being sued by Bracewell-Smith over their advice relating to the sale of her 15.9% stake in the Premier League club to Kroenke's company KSE in 2011.
In a particulars of claim form, filed on 31 January, Bracewell-Smith alleges that Linklaters was negligent and in breach of its duty of care in relation to advice given on loan notes she received in exchange for her stake in the club.
It goes on to claim that, but for the errors by both Linklaters and Deloitte, which allegedly exposed her to capital gains tax liabilities, she "would not have sold her Arsenal shares to KSE but rather would have sold them to Alisher Usmanov (or some other purchaser)".
Kroenke now owns a 67% stake in the club, with Russian businessman Usmanov holding 30%.
The Linklaters lawyers referenced in the claim are former partner Ian Bagshaw and associate Stuart Boyd, both of whom have since left the firm. Bagshaw, who left in 2013, is now global co-head of private equity at US firm White & Case, while Boyd joined Kirkland & Ellis in 2016 after making partner at Linklaters in 2013.
The claim states that the sale of Bracewell-Smith's shares "would be liable to capital gains tax (CGT) on a remittance basis in the event that the disposal took place in exchange for non-qualifying corporate bonds sited outside the UK".
However, the loan notes were instead registered and the register held at the London offices of Clifford Chance (CC) – KSE's advisers on the deal. According to the claim, siting the loan notes in the UK meant that if Bracewell-Smith "as an English tax resident, redeemed the loan notes, she would have been liable to pay CGT on their full value".
The claim states: "Linklaters should not have settled the documents and advised the claimant [Bracewell-Smith] to sign them unless they were sure that the documents satisfied any and all requirements for the loan notes to be non-qualifying bonds sited outside the UK."
Bracewell-Smith alleges that she was not adequately informed of what she describes as "the error as to the location of the register", with the filing stating that she was not told until 5 July 2011, despite an email being sent by Boyd to CC on 26 May 2011 requesting that KSE relocate the register of the loan notes outside of the UK.
The document states: "It is to be inferred that Linklaters and Deloitte deliberately chose not to inform the claimant of the true position and of their breaches of duty to her."
While Linklaters and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan subsequently attempted to persuade KSE to remove the register from the UK, their attempts were unsuccessful, prompting Bracewell-Smith to move to Monaco. In order to reduce her tax exposure, the filing states that she has to be non-resident in the UK for six consecutive tax years, leaving her based outside the UK until April 2019 at the earliest.
Bracewell-Smith claims that she has incurred losses of more than £10m as a result of the loan note error, as well as incurring costs of £1,249,815 for her move to Monaco and more than £400,000 in fees to professional advisers that she would not have required had the loan notes been sited outside the UK.
She is also claiming general damages for the "distress and inconvenience" she has suffered as a result of her relocation, which has impacted on her ability to return to the UK to visit friends and family.
West End firm Gordon Dadds is acting for Bracewell-Smith.
Two years after selling her stake in the club, Bracewell-Smith said that she "deeply" regretted selling to Kroenke, in tweets which have since been deleted. Arsenal's regular lawyers at Slaughter and May acted for the club on the 2011 sale.
Linklaters, White & Case, Deloitte, Boyd and Kirkland all declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHengeler, Noerr, Freshfields Steer Multi-Million Euro Deals for XXXLutz, Huf Group & More
3 minute readGoodwin Enlisted for $1.15 Billion GSK Acquisition of US Biopharma Business
Freshfields Leads European M&A Rankings Again in 2024, as U.S. Firms Gain Market Share
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts Grapple With The Corporate Transparency Act
- 2FTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
- 3‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
- 4Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 5Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250